Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

will jennings

Recent activity

Comments (40)

  • Comment on: Populous in last two for Milan’s San Siro stadium replacement

    will jennings's comment 23 October, 2019 5:26 pm

    I wasn't so much criticising, than just suggesting any architect who is signed up to Architects Declare should publicly state how any project relates to the pledges, otherwise the pledges remain distinct from real projects and not something to be continually tested against.

    There will be logical reasons in many instances for not always aligning to the pledges, but if they are acknowledged in press releases & discussion then at least it can be a public conversation.

    But, more importantly, having been to the San Siro to see Ipswich Town play (and lose against!) Inter, those never-ending spirals will be a huge loss to stadium architecture! Not to mention the power of turning the corner from the stables and seeing that wonderful roof towering above.

  • Comment on: Populous in last two for Milan’s San Siro stadium replacement

    will jennings's comment 22 October, 2019 10:03 am

    Populous have signed up to Architects Declare. I would like to know more information about their proposal with regards to the pledges:

    Upgrade existing buildings for extended use as a more carbon efficient alternative to demolition and new build whenever there is a viable choice.

    Evaluate all new projects against the aspiration to contribute positively to mitigating climate breakdown, and encourage our clients to adopt this approach.

    Adopt more regenerative design principles in our studios, with the aim of designing architecture and urbanism that goes beyond the standard of net zero carbon in use.

    Minimise wasteful use of resources in architecture and urban planning, both in quantum and in detail.

  • Comment on: Foster + Partners to design ‘landmark’ scheme in Shard’s shadow

    will jennings's comment 17 October, 2019 1:29 pm

    How many landmarks does one square mile need?

  • Comment on: Garden Bridge risks were ‘downplayed’ to please Boris Johnson

    will jennings's comment 15 October, 2019 10:40 am

    While there is nothing new or revelationary in this report, it is worth reading for those who have followed this whole debacle for how it concentrates on that key period of Johnson's directive to soften the payment requirements and the consequential decision by Trustees to sign a huge contract, which has still not been made public.

    This also reads as a final line on the matter by the Assembly, and is a clear call for Meg Hillier and the Parliamentary Accounts Commission to pick up the baton and use all the documentation that has come from City Hall and elsewhere to use their stronger powers of summons and scrutiny to fully investigate and hold to account.

  • Comment on: Former RIBA president joins call to revoke Boris’s fellowship

    will jennings's comment 29 September, 2019 10:08 am

    To "Anon" and "Number 5", I am not sure the point of this is to be the *thing* which stops Johnson for good.

    It's just a matter of ethics and responsibility. Having considered the points made by the petition, should it be that Johnson has the ethics which suit the honorary position? It will probably not be reported outside of architectural press, and have not a jot of difference to the bigger scheme of things, and that's fine and irrelevant. But what are the ethics of RIBA, that's still quite important if the institution is to have any value to its members.

View all comments