Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Tom Woolley

Recent activity

Comments (1)

  • Comment on: RIBA and ARB ethical codes attacked

    Tom Woolley's comment 1 July, 2015 11:30 am

    The ARB Code of Conduct is not fit for purpose because it fails to put sufficient responsibility on architects to tackle environmental issues

    The 2002 Code put an explicit responsibility on architects to tackle environmental issues
    "Standard 5 2002 Code
    Whilst Architects' primary responsibility is to their clients, they should nevertheless have due regard to their wider responsibility to conserve and enhance the quality of the environment and its natural resources."

    This was watered down in the 2010 code following pressure from the RIBA and there Association of Consultant Architects.
    "Standard 5 2010 Code 5.1 Whilst your primary responsibility is to your clients, you should take into account the environmental impact of your professional activities."

    “Taking into account” environmental issues is far too weak
    The stronger 2002 statement should be reinstated and strengthened even further. ARB should establish a working party to advise the BOard on ethical and environmental issues before changing the code

Job of the week

AJ Jobs