Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

RIBA report: A no deal Brexit would spell disaster for UK architecture


A damning RIBA report says that a ‘no-deal’ Brexit could severely damage Britain’s architectural profession 

The report, Global Talent, Global Reach, published today, concludes that a ‘no deal’ result could mean £73 million is lost in architectural service exports to the EU every year.

The document says that architecture contributes a massive £4.8 billion to the UK economy annually. It also warns that the UK’s position as a ‘global architectural hub’, which attracts the best EU talent, could be at risk if access to European architects is cut off.

The publication comes one day after Brexit secretary David Davis was widely slated for saying that 50 economic impact assessments of leaving the EU he had been told to publish – including one on architecture – did not actually exist.

Commenting on the report, RIBA president Ben Derbyshire said: ‘Without a Brexit deal that works for UK architecture, we risk losing more of our global talent due to increased costs and economic uncertainty. A no deal Brexit is not an option; it would be a disaster for UK architecture and our built environment, and the government must take this option off the table.

‘This means remaining open to the best and brightest talent from around the world and a new trade relationship with the EU and the rest of the world.’

He concluded: ‘Anything less will lead to a skills exodus, higher costs across the industry and the failure to deliver domestic policies on housing, infrastructure and the industrial strategy all of which rely on our being open for business to international design talent.’

Nevertheless, the report also says that, despite the risks posed by Brexit, there is potential for the UK to grow its architectural services outside the EU by forming new trade deals with China, the USA, India, and the United Arab Emirates. These new markets, it says, could yield minimum returns of £54 million in the first year.

The RIBA is urging the government to take ‘immediate steps’ to protect the British architecture industry throughout the Brexit negotiations. It is calling on parliament to secure a post-Brexit immigration system that allows continued access to EU and global talent, as well as the mutual recognition of architects’ professional qualifications in the EU. It also wants more agreements of this kind for architects in markets in the USA, Canada, Australia, and China.

The institute is also asking for a Brexit deal that maintains market access with the EU, and for the Department for International Trade to expand its scope of supporting medium and small sized businesses globally. 

RIBA chief executive Alan Vallance said: ‘Brexit poses a real threat to the profession’s future prosperity. The UK government must make assurances to safeguard our profession post-Brexit by ensuring our members have full access to talent from across the EU and around the world.

‘I want to maintain and build upon London and the UK’s reputation as a global architecture talent hub, attracting the brightest from around the world.’


Related files

Readers' comments (5)

  • 'A no deal Brexit is not an option; it would be a disaster for UK architecture and our built environment, and the government must take this option off the table.'

    If you take it off the table then you have to accept whatever the EU offer. I mean why not £100bn or more? And we have to enforce all their regulations. etc etc.

    This is just nonsense, can't you think at all?


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Seems like 'Remoaner Cental' at RIBA then ;-)
    More scare stories, more terror, more fake news, just to stir the pot.

    It would be truly illuminating if those who put this report together - Mark Jackson, Lucy Monks and Andrew Forth - were declare just how they voted on the Leave/Remain question. Though we may have an inkling as to the answer already.

    Will RIBA be publishing the view from the other side of the coin, any time soon? Hmmmm, thought not.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Doh, typo... Central, not Cental :-)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • MacKenzie Architects

    So, they're saying we lose £73 million a year in exports, and gain £54 million in fees from ME etc., then we add the benefit of employing more UK-grown architects, and the saving against bringing in foreign talent, then we open more european offices ourselves.
    Then we encourage UK manufacturers to produce better quality goods, and import less from abroad.
    Then we start learning foreign languages in school and start looking outwards.
    We have to compete in this world, Europe isn't the major threat, it's China and India.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • With reference to Ian Morrison's typo, why oh why can't the AJ incorporate an 'edit' facility for Readers' Comments in their digital offering? Most newspapers seem able to.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more