Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.


Labour slams Boris over lower housing targets


The London Society is hosting a debate on this subject, chaired by the BBC's Mark Easton, with the title #CantPayWontStay on 14 April. The event is a sell-out, but the Society's paper, 'Building Greater London' can be downloaded here: http://www.hta.co.uk/news/posts/building-greater-london In summary: 1) Building Greater London requires a complete overhaul of the governance of an area that extends well beyond the boundaries of the present GLA area. 2) The London Society is promoting a Royal Commission to consider appropriate mechanisms for UK’s City regions alongside the rapidly emerging devolution agenda. 3) We should re-assert the primacy of the Green Belt, refine the policies that protect it, invest in it to improve its biodiversity and improve access to it for Londoners. 4) This requires city leadership with a purpose and a plan to deliver diverse housing in a sustainable context of the kind London’s citizens want - a plan for delivery, not just a spatial one. 5) A century after the London Society first proposed it, we should finish off the ragged fringe of London neatly with groups of ‘new and seemly buildings’, particularly where arterial routes cut across the green and enter London. 6) The vision should embrace the concept of collective responsibility and shared ownership of the capital’s precious assets. 7) The Mayor’s Private Rented Covenant exemplifies how management might be regulated in such a way as to enable the sharing of resources, including space, and simultaneously open the door to more diversity in ways of living available to Londoners. 8) The Mayoralty would thus be in a position to promote and encourage diverse, not standard, solutions to Londoners’ housing needs, as others have done in Melbourne, Paris, Berlin, Copenhagen, New York and in the port city of Iquique, Chile, examples which are illustrated in the paper. 9) Such a diversity would be an appropriate response to the lively entrepreneurial and culturally inventive mix that has come to be such an attractive feature of contemporary London life. I shall argue that the capital is in danger of becoming a city of rentiers, with unheard of windfalls accruing to a few landowners, unless we strengthen the governance of the city with devolved powers of tax and spend, including a levy on land value, and promote a much more diverse housing offer. Ben Derbyshire. Managing Partner, HTA Design LLP Chair, The Housing Forum.

Posted date

8 April, 2015

Posted time

10:04 am