Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Skyline: five demands for London

Comment

I (Richard Dorkin) write this sat in my 14 floor office in Hong Kong where I and many others find the collage of tall buildings fascinating and interesting. The drivers in HK are values and the supposed lack of land. If London wants to consider its place as a world city it needs to consider Richard Rogers correct views on no more garden cities. Cities work when the public infrastructure and density coalesce to provide a truly vibrant place to live, work and play. The key issues of the impact of tall buildings are the reality that views will be obscured, air movement hindered, heat island effect intensified and neighbours needing to consider purchasing blinds and curtains. London would do well to seriously consider its skyline as an aesthetic if it feels that it will add to its appeal but I fear that the businesses within the buildings of London will be the real attraction as they are in all world cities. The key aspect is to ensure mixed use developments of high quality architecture. I doubt many people look up above their walking sight line to look at what’s above them unless stopped and asked to.

Posted date

18 July, 2014

Posted time

8:19 am

required
required
required
required