Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

dRMM hits back at ‘perceived hypocrisy’ in row over Silvertown Tunnel job

Comment

The phrase "the practice had taken the decision to be involved in order to try to make the project more sustainable" could be used to justify working on any project, including coal power stations if it came to it. That said, the new Silvertown Tunnel could be argued to be a good solution in that it will reduce pollution creating bottlenecks in the Blackwall Tunnel and will allow better bus links across the river. All architects and consultants need to think carefully before they proclaim a strong stance against selected perceived "unsustainable" projects. They will find that virtually any building project could be argued to be "unsustainable" in that they will involve carbon emissions and pollution. Are architects prepared to accept less work as a price to pay for stopping new infrastructure projects?

Posted date

11 May, 2020

Posted time

9:52 am

required
required
required
required