Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Awards should be about excellence, not messages

Comment

A cynical and depressingly regressive article, followed by the refreshing opposite of reality and possibility (thanks Piers). It's absolutely true that the last thing we need is to focus on more 'iconic' buildings - in a city where a glut of money has bought the architectural equivalent of the mid-life crisis red convertible. Those huge schemes could be justifiable winners based on architectural technical design (arguably not so difficult with open coffers), as the smaller schemes equally can, but these have the added value that they have utilised design and critical thinking to address the reality we currently live in, as opposed to regressing our society with schemes such as T5. Since when did architecture become unrelated to people, society and life?

Posted date

12 February, 2020

Posted time

10:15 am

required
required
required
required