Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Twickenham Riverside contest designs revealed

Comment

It's difficult to judge six schemes for the same site with only perspectives to go on, and with no background on the differences in briefs between the schemes. But, on the evidence presented, Francis Terry's scheme wipes the floor with the current five proposals, none of which demonstrate anything like Terry's understanding of how to address the river, use appropriate scale when viewed from the river or its banks, create coherent form, proportion, massing and above all a real sense of place-making. The current five range from feeble but inoffensive to downright horrendous. I,m not suggesting that Terry has the only answer - in the last couple of decades there has been a growing awareness among some modern architects of the lessons of history (eg Ancient Greece and Rome, Italian hill towns), in particular relating to place-making and the civic realm. The current five schemes completely fail to address the huge potential of this exceptional site. None of them are anywhere near good enough, and the promoters need to start again

Posted date

16 September, 2019

Posted time

10:18 pm

required
required
required
required