Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Reaction to Scruton sacking: ‘It was foreseeable this ludicrous appointment would end badly’

Comment

I am pleased to see Scruton gone, after wrongfully calling himself an architect and now after his non-inclusive behaviour. Of course the whole appointment and ideaology behind it were farcical, which is a not unknown position for this government. What I don't understand is why the writer and some of the correspondents go on to talk about London. The coverage of this post was supposed to be UK wide (another ridiculous scenario: can you imagine Scruton telling an architect in Glasgow how to make things pretty there?). So I ask again. Why is anyone talking about London? Are we not clever enough to know when to bypass parochialism?

Posted date

10 April, 2019

Posted time

9:05 pm

required
required
required
required

Job of the week

AJ Jobs