Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Let’s have honesty about the costs of the Westminster retrofit

Comment

Also it would be good to have a well argued case for why: - This cramped building is still suitable. (Because it's facilities don't appear fit for the present let alone the future). - The chambers are adequate for the number of MP's & Lords. (They can't even seat everyone) - Chambers based on opposing factions are better than a radial design. - etc. Certainly its cost will be well above that quoted, the disruption will be prolonged, and the result - essentialy a restoration undertaken for the sake of nostalgia. Unlike the Olympics which benefited so greatly from it, there has been hardly any design debate about this project. Perhaps it would be better as a hotel?

Posted date

30 March, 2019

Posted time

8:18 pm

required
required
required
required

Job of the week

AJ Jobs