Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.


Serpentine Pavilion architect under fire over unpaid interns


That sounds like an S&M dungeon (not that I would know!)...but I suppose that we are simply regressing to a laissez-faire former era, such as Victorian times. Dickens portrays this quite well in ‘Martin Chuzzlewit’ (1844), where his eponymous hero purchases an architectural pupillage from Seth Pecksniff Archt. for £300. This turns out to be nothing of the sort and Pecksniff is living off his pupils’ premiums, while passing off their work as his own. Some 30 years later pupils, such as Edward S Prior, got slightly better value out of Richard Norman Shaw Archt. for their £500 premium. If the present allegations have sufficient validity, it seems that the Serpentine should take the moral high ground and rescind this commission immediately. As most galleries are doing with Sackler money. Public pressure could be brought to bear by boycotting the Serpentine.

Posted date

24 March, 2019

Posted time

8:14 pm