Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Five things architects can do tomorrow to limit climate change

Comment

Plenty of thought provoking information and ideas here, and Piers Taylor surely makes a very pertinent observation about '...buildings that lack the resilience to adapt or are designed with little thought of how they might be adapted in future and are pulled down after less than 40 years'. Add Jonathan Tuckey's comment on the requirement for deconstructing and recycling redundant buildings in Switzerland, and I think of what are - literally - modern buildings in central London that are apparently useless and get torn down with little or no regard for recycling anything other than steel and rubble And sometime they're of high architectural quality - Broadgate, anyone?

Posted date

15 March, 2019

Posted time

9:54 am

required
required
required
required