Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

‘Architecture is political; it’s time for the timber revolution’

Comment

I hate to be negative about a well intentioned article but architecture is in desperate need of some scientific rigor at the moment. This is full of false claims and mis-quoted science. Timber is considered to have embodied energy three times higher than concrete by everyone but timber industry lobbyists. Kiln dried imported timber and formaldehyde glues aren't the most low impact materials. https://www.pmcarchitects.com/sustainability-content-paul-mcalister-architects/your-carbon-budget-understanding-embodied-energy Similarly the claim that the built environment is the primary source of CO2 emissions is a fundamental misunderstanding of the statistics. We spend 90% of our time indoors, that doesn't mean that everything people do indoors is down to the architecture we design. We have to be accurate and serious about carbon emissions if we want to be confident about reducing them effectively

Posted date

29 November, 2018

Posted time

12:08 pm

required
required
required
required

Job of the week

AJ Jobs