Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.


Smaller firms should be made to report gender pay gaps, MPs say


The previous comment makes no sense. The mean average pay for each gender is a straightforward calculation, and is exactly what it says on the tin. There may or may not be good reasons why certain practices have higher gender pay gaps, but regardless, this figure is a piece of factual evidence. Evidence of what? In a profession where most architecture schools are 50/50, it shows that women are - for whatever reasons - getting stuck at the bottom of the profession and/ or not valued as much as men by their employers. As someone who runs a practice with 48% women, and can report a pay gap of 1% in favour of women, I see no good reason at all why high-quality firms would not be able to attract and keep high-ranking women architects. And consequently no reason other than old-fashioned gender bias why a high-quality firm should not be able to keep their gender pay gaps in check.

Posted date

3 August, 2018

Posted time

8:18 pm


Job of the week

AJ Jobs