Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

News analysis: Five questions about Grenfell Tower that must be answered

Comment

Thank you AJ ! I might have put as the top question, Why in a multi-million pound "refurb" was apparently no consideration given to ensuring a working fire alarm system, two ways out at ground floor, check & improve all fire precautions, a pressurised fire escape stair and so on. One would therefore begin to question how negligent the landlords were. Secondly, One should question whether the over-cladding system as installed was SAFE. We all know Building Regs were not updated after the Coroner's report for Lakanal. Successive minister refused to act. In parliament a bill to require all rented accommodation to be "fit-for-purpose" was voted down by over a hundred Tory landlords. We all also know why these materials have been banned in Germany. No hiding behind lousy Regs. What should be done? Immediately evacuate all over-clad flat blocks. Stop over-cladding except with incombustible, non-plastic insulants. Remaining tower blocks are likely safe if not subjected to a catastrophic extra fire load / hazard of cladding. Especially if they have fire alarms and so on. Although the idea of a one stair block 24 storeys high does give me worries.

Posted date

20 June, 2017

Posted time

11:38 am

required
required
required
required