Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.


Minister blasts ‘descendants of Brutalism’ and pledges to rebuild Euston Arch


Mr Hayes' views on modern architecture obviously catch the headlines, but shouldn't detract from his views on Euston station. This is surely the most dismal of London's main termini - definitely not a good example of anything, as far as I can see - and we've waited far too long for the resurrection of the Euston Arch. This project has so much more going for it than the imposition of Lumley, Johnson, Osborne and Heatherwick's narcissistic project for a garden bridge across the Thames, and when and if this finally evaporates (mostly at our expense) perhaps the more altruistic of the sponsors might see their way to help finance the resurrection of Hardwick's magnificent arch. The Euston Arch Trust deserves all the support that the Garden Bridge Trust doesn't - and, dare I say it, the Arch would be a significant feature of tourist London. In terms of the architectural history of this area of the city, the reconstruction of Euston Arch would also be no small compensation for the same Heatherwick's arrogant butchering of the grade II listed Kings Cross coal drops on the altar of the shopping religion. Hardwick versus Heatherwick? it's no contest.

Posted date

4 November, 2016

Posted time

10:42 am


Job of the week

AJ Jobs