Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

What a week for Glasgow

  • 1 Comment

If Glasgow learns the lessons of the past week’s shambles it can come out of it with pride intact, says Rory Olcayto

What a week last week was for Glasgow. It began with John McAslan’s redesign of George Square winning the council’s competition to land the £15 million commission, only for it to be scrapped the same day by council leader and jury member, Gordon Matheson.

Cue much debate on the quality of the shortlisted entries, the council’s shabby behaviour, and citizens’ rights regarding the public realm. (None of the schemes were popular with Glaswegians, who rightly felt the competition’s consultation process was extremely light-touch).

By the end of the week there was even bigger news: the city had won a £24 million government-backed ‘smart city’ grant, beating off competition from 30 other British cities and towns. The plan is to use real-time information about transport, energy, crime and health to demonstrate how integrated data management can improve both the local economy and the quality of life.

It may sound dull - one objective is the creation of an app for reporting potholes and missing bin collections - but the government is keen to spin it for all its worth.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, science minister David Willetts said: ‘Where Glasgow leads, the rest of the country follows, and I think the rest of the world follows. This is about what is going to happen in São Paulo and Lagos. These are export opportunities.’

Willetts’ patter is spot-on, and will go down well with the locals. Even when the city is running ragged, as it is now - a report last year said 21 per cent of stores in the city centre are without tenants - a swaggering pride holds sway. Problem is: no one is listening. The news has failed to spark a debate among Glaswegians, or urban designers and city-watchers across the UK, while the aborted George Square competition continues to engage bloggers, journalists and architects alike. No wonder - the human dimension, and the scandal, is intriguing.

New claims suggest Matheson scrapped the competition in a ‘fit of pique’. Why? Not for the official reason: because he was listening to the public, who objected to the removal of the square’s notable statues under the council’s redesign. And not because his position at City Chambers had been weakened by the revelation that Strathclyde Police had logged an alleged public sex act between the council leader and another man.

Burns + Nice competition entry

Burns + Nice competition entry

No - the competition was scrapped because Matheson, well-placed council sources told The Herald, had ‘thrown his toys out the pram’ when the scheme he favoured, Burns + Nice’s flowerbed arrangement, which in plan resembles a Saltire cross - was rejected in favour of McAslan’s stonier, realistically dour, proposal. (One of the London Scot’s images showed the square in use under heavy rainfall, while the Leicester Square revamp architect’s design, placed fourth, was bathed in sunlight).

The design contest, one Labour councillor said, has been ‘a f *** ing disaster’ for Glasgow. ‘It was all vanity stuff. Matheson probably wanted his name in George Square somewhere. It’s like Carry On Council sometimes. You couldn’t make it up.’

Yet if these various strands are woven together: 1) a renewed belief by city leaders to work with its citizens on public realm design; 2) the smart city initiative that will use data to more effectively manage a city’s resources; 3) an acknowledgement that Glasgow’s retail-led regeneration programme is now a busted flush given the number of vacant stores; 4) which in turn suggests a renewed opportunity to propose residential and new-tech industry uses for the city centre, then Glasgow might come out of this with some pride intact. And where Glasgow leads…

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • 21% of city centre shops empty, but meanwhile plans to double the size of the city centre Buchanan Galleries retail centre are forging ahead, including the provision of 1700 parking spaces and £80m of 'public realm improvements' funded by the city council, who see the project as a key to regeneration in this area of the city centre.
    Meanwhile, the 'public realm' in other areas of the city centre - some already the subject of past improvement - is left to degenerate.
    It just doesn't add up.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.