Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Serious books on architecture struggle to find a publisher

Ellis Woodman

There is more appetite for focused architectural writing than UK publishers understand, says Ellis Woodman

This country’s small community of editors and designers who specialise in the publication of architectural books has suffered a gruelling time of late. First, in December of last year, the Architectural Association slashed its publications department from eight staff members to two in a panicked cost-cutting exercise. Then a month later the publishing house Black Dog went into liquidation, taking down Artifice Books, its specialist architecture, urbanism and design division, with it.

Both AA Publications and Artifice maintained strong reputations for supporting projects that larger publishers would never consider. Their misfortunes will ensure not only that fewer architecture books are published in this country, but that their variety diminishes too.

Some years ago, I met with a major art and architecture publisher who had expressed an interest in me writing a general interest book for them. I excitedly pitched half a dozen ideas but it soon became apparent that none remotely fitted the bill. In fact, it turned out that my would-be patrons could only really conceive of publishing books that accorded with one of two tried and tested formats. 

The first was an all-text production, in the manner of Deyan Sudjic’s The Edifice Complex, Rowan Moore’s Slow Burn City or Tom Dyckhoff’s The Age of Spectacle. These are all good books but their focus is broad – their concern lies with the social context of architectural production, rather than with the discipline itself.  

The other scenario on offer was even less alluring: a high-concept picture book. Ceding the honour of writing the captions for The World’s Best Dog Kennels to one of my more pecuniarily challenged colleagues, I made my excuses and left.

The experience made me wonder whether the books that had first introduced me to architecture as a teenager would still find a publisher today. John Summerson’s Language of Classical Architecture, Robert Venturi’s Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture and Charles Jencks’s The Language of Postmodern Architecture are all books that have enjoyed numerous reprints, but the kind of measured relationship between text and image that makes these publications so pleasurable and informative is clearly now deemed a commercial non-starter.

Yet, if this is the received wisdom, it is surely one that deserves challenging. I am currently working on a book based on lectures from the Architecture Foundation’s recent programme, which we plan to release ourselves. It is an experiment which I am conscious may fail, but I am lent confidence by the response to the recent publication of Richard Murphy’s excellent Carlo Scarpa and Castelvecchio Revisited.

The trajectory of architectural history has been influenced by the written word to an incalculable extent

Having had his book rejected by every publisher that he approached, Richard decided to risk printing and distributing it himself. Reluctant to accept the high cut that the digital portal takes on sales, he has even steered clear of placing it on Amazon. He reports that, with the aid of strong reviews and an advertising campaign conducted on Instagram, he is now receiving orders at the rate of one per hour. He printed 3,000 copies in December and, if he maintains the current level of interest, should shift the lot by September.


The trajectory of architectural history has been influenced by the written word to an incalculable extent – notably more so than has been the case with the other visual, or for that matter, performing arts. In the last century alone, books by Loos, Le Corbusier, Rossi, Venturi and Koolhaas proved absolutely instrumental in defining its path. It is a contribution to architectural discourse that needs defending and nurturing, now more than ever.  

I am convinced that there is a much larger audience for serious architecture books than the current British publishing culture recognises. We need to prove it but, with the new methods of digital marketing and distribution at our disposal, we have the tools to do so.

This article appears in the Small Projects issue


Readers' comments (3)

  • There's also an issue of value in all of this as some publishers pay peanuts. I was recently 'invited' to write a book for established independent publisher of specialist books. 1) they actually had no idea behind the invitation so they also wanted a book proposal 2) offered no support so expected the writer to source all images sources etc... and 3) wanted 40,000-60,000 words: all this for a fee of £1500 plus royalies from sales to their specialist (i.e. small) audience. Ellis's model of cross programme book production is an interesting model; one of a number that will hopefully mean that serious books aren't written by a privilege few for a privileged few.
    I would also add that there's nothing wrong with the model of paid for monographs, as long as the commissioners want serious writing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This would be a good subject for a seminar at the Architecture. foundation. I have found it confusing to navigate through the options for publishing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with Hank.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.