Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Our public land is being squandered

Architype shaldon road crop

We should also be building for social and environmental outcomes, not profit alone, says Jonny Anstead

The UK’s public land bank is being steadily sold off in the country’s largest process of privatisation, writes Jonny Anstead. Over four decades since Thatcher, it has shrunk by 2 million hectares, a rate of about 70,000ha a year.

Framed as a sensible use of surplus assets, sale of public land has become an integral part of housing policy. The government’s Public Land for Housing programme aims to deliver 160,000 new homes from sale of public land from 2015 to 2020, while raising £5 billion in receipts. And stretched public bodies are happy to oblige: ‘selling the family silver’ has become vital to funding local services in the era of austerity.

But, in the dash for new housing, quality and design are scarcely considered. Indiscriminate land sales do little more than facilitate the poorly designed, unaffordable and car-dependent forms of housing that survey after survey shows most people, given a real choice, would rather not live in. Public bodies might argue that their local plans set their standards for development but this ignores the power they wield as landowners.  

Like many acts of privatisation, the decimation of the public land bank is both short-sighted and irreversible. Land is the ultimate non-renewable resource. And, when public land is sold, it leaves the system for good.

Of course, there are legal protections around the disposal of public assets. Section 123 of the 1972 Local Government Act requires local authorities to sell land for ‘the best consideration reasonably attainable’. Put simply, this requires them to behave in the same way as any private landowner: to obtain the highest possible price for its land, with no regard to other considerations. Local benefit, longer-term value and sustainability are irrelevant. 

In spite of this, some public bodies have adopted more enlightened approaches. Lewisham council identified the benefits of self-build housing and made land available on terms that would enable community self-builders to access it.

Bristol City Council placed a value on social returns, selling land to the city’s community land trust for 100 per cent affordable homes.

And Transport for London, through its Small Sites programme, has engaged with smaller developers, with a focus on design quality, not just price.

While Treasury guidance supports such approaches (‘the valuation of a publicly owned asset is based on the interests of society as a whole, not the council alone’), there’s little to indicate that they’re even close to becoming mainstream. For most local authority officers, ever mindful of the district auditor, the easiest and lowest-risk way to sell land is to flog it to the highest bidder.

If we want better-designed, more sustainable homes that respond to the many and varied needs of the people who will live in them, then we should start by transforming the way we use the land that remains in public ownership. 

Firstly, that means selling less of it, and the rise of direct development ventures such as Brick By Brick in Croydon is welcome. But, if it is to be sold, we should make it work much harder, by changing the rules – and the culture – around public land disposals. 

How can this be achieved? The current, narrow requirement on public bodies to achieve best financial value should be scrapped in favour of a duty to demonstrate best social and environmental, alongside financial, outcomes – a ‘triple lock’ – on public land. Taking a holistic view of the value of development would no longer be just an option, but an obligation.

This change would place vision, quality, design and social outcomes at the heart of the process. It would create a level playing field, where all sorts of organisations, currently excluded from the land market, could compete effectively to acquire sites.

And it would have the potential to unleash a generation of SME developers, ethical investors, co-operative builders, cohousing groups and community land trusts, which, more than the Plc housebuilders, have the potential to help solve the UK’s housing crisis.

Jonny Anstead is a co-founder of developer TOWN

Image: visualisation of Architype’s Shaldon Road community housing scheme on the outskirts of Bristol, which is backed by Bristol Community Land Trust. The project is currently on site


Readers' comments (3)

  • The passing reference to the Plc housebuilders could do with not so much expanding as blowing sky-high.
    A current sojourn for nearly a year in South Devon has opened my eyes to just how much a mixture of greed, cynicism and incompetence is influencing the behaviour of at least some of the mass housebuilders - everything from usurious leasehold scams to absolutely dreadful construction quality - extending to the omission of cavity firestops on an industrial scale by one developer - and the strong-arming of local authorities to relax design standards or face delays in provision of much needed houses.
    I don't think it's being too far fetched to liken it to organised crime, and the only obvious explanation for its success is the chronic shortage of the product on offer.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I wonder if the Bristol Community Land Trust gave their backing to the Shaldon Road project because of the CGI displayed in this article.
    For, if they did there should be some very angry voices a few years down the road as the graphic bears no resemblance to the future dilapidated slum the development will become.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Community led Housing initiative is best placed to provide the sort of housing the communities need in the areas where they need them. It nurtures cooperation and mutual understanding and helps develop skills necessary to deliver and maintain successful affordable housing developments. Supported and funded by Sadiq Kahn, Community Housing Hub, provides resources, mentorship and advice necessary to meaningfully engage with London's housing crisis. Expanding their brief and funding, so they can also engage with London's Local Authorities would make the ultimate difference to the outcome.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more