Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Just what we don’t need: a new housing minister

Emily Booth
  • 1 Comment

With housing starts falling, this turbulent week in politics has served up the eighth housing minister in as many years. Preserve us from these interesting times, writes Emily Booth

‘May you live in interesting times’ goes the old Chinese curse. And it’s all the more chilling, somehow, because it seems so innocuous.

Certainly housing, a critical sector for the profession and the wider construction industry, is having an interesting time just now. Housing starts on site have fallen by their sharpest level for over a year. The sector scored 154 on the much-watched Glenigan Index last month, down a whopping 25 per cent on the same month a year earlier. The Glenigan Index measures new starts on site over the preceding three months and excludes both very large and very small schemes. And within that data, the numbers show that new social housing projects have plummeted a shocking 42 per cent.

Housing – rightly in the spotlight after the Grenfell Tower fire tragedy and the many failures that led to it – is central to communities’ success and wellbeing. It should be at the forefront of government policies for growth and investment.

We hope Malthouse can stay considerably longer than his predecessor so he can effect real change

Against this backdrop, this turbulent week in politics served up just what the housing sector doesn’t need: a new housing minister. The eighth since 2010. Dominic Raab had hardly got his feet under the desk before he was whisked off to lead the Brexit negotiations. Perhaps he will do better than David Davis in the Department for Exiting the European Union hot-seat; we can only hope. We wish Kit Malthouse well with the vital housing brief, and we hope he can stay considerably longer than Raab so he can effect real change. 

RIBA president Ben Derbyshire is right when he says: ‘If the government are as serious as they say they are about building the homes and communities the country desperately needs, we need to see real, continued leadership at the top of government. The crisis in affordability and quality of housing will not be addressed without it.’

As for all this chopping and changing and uncertainty: City traders might love it (that’s how they make their money), but wider industry doesn’t. As Christine Murray points out in her thought-provoking article on Brexit, ‘the uncertainty is maddening. With the cliff-edge in sight, the whole industry is facing the loss – in just eight months’ time – of an already dwindling European migrant workforce and friction-free access to building materials … In London, 28 per cent of construction workers are from the EU. What will happen on site, and how will it affect costs?’

These are timely questions, and interesting times, indeed.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Just keep appointing housing ministers until you get one that knows what they are doing, keeps the job, and makes a difference. Is there an architect in this House of Fools? Would they have the fight for the Imbroglio?

    Is there another body or person that could take charge, independent of the usual vested interests? Modern problems in science, sociology and technology have been solved. It’s not impossible given time, skill and resources? Where do we start?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs