Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Is the ideological attack on the Cass part of a new Green Paper agenda?

Central House
  • 1 Comment

More universities could be in for the troubles the Cass has faced, says Fionn Stevenson

Robert Mull and Helen Mallinson’s resignations from London Metropolitan University (LMU) is the result of their principled stand against a vulnerable institution being first in line for the current government ideological project for mass marketisation of higher education.

The Cass is due for a major cull as part of the move to a new site, in order to make the university more ‘economically viable’. LMU is easy meat, given its recent troubles with student visas, but no other institute of higher education should think for a moment that it will be spared the same treatment.

The government’s latest Green Paper on higher education makes it quite clear that it wants to see students turned into product consumers rather than thinkers, and to see private and commercial providers step in to take over a ‘failing’ public service. Where is the evidence that higher education is failing, when our programmes, teaching and research remain the envy of the world? Where have we seen this iniquitous action before – NHS, anyone? 

In its quest for simple economic packages that suit the market, this government will strip core values of diversity and inclusivity away from higher education. Bursaries are no substitute for equal access. Equally, architecture programmes are particularly vulnerable if they continue to privilege the notion of making, with all the extra costs that are involved, and which require subsidy if we are to be able to offer students all programmes on a level playing field of fees and access. 

Jack Self has captured the situation perfectly in a recent article in The Architectural Review:

The Greeks believed the advance of civilisation only occurred when politics triumphed over economics or, in other words, when collective interest succeeded over the interests of particular families. The opposite – when the interests of private factions made governance of the city impossible – was what the Greeks defined as civil war, and their word for it was “stasis”: the time when nothing can go forward.’

 It is surely time to take a stand, collectively to resist this ‘stasis’ and support genuinely progressive architectural education.

Fionn Stevenson is head of Sheffield School of Architecture at Sheffield University

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • This critique of government policy just compounds the evidence of dogma-driven damage to a wide range of what until recently have been seen traditionally as core public sector responsibilities, from health services to flood protection.
    The excuse seems to be the need to 'cut out the fat' in a time of extreme austerity, but the main driver - the Treasury, in the shape of the ambitious and manipulative Mr Osborne - is now well into the process of 'throwing out the baby with the bathwater', and I wonder who will eventually be struggling to prevent the baby from drowning?
    Surely not Mr Osborne, whose own taxpayer-funded support for the vanity Garden Bridge projects suggests an underlying honesty deficit (to put it politely).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs