Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Glancey on Stamp: ‘Outspoken, even savagely indignant, yet never personally unkind’

  • 2 Comments

Architecture critic Jonathan Glancey pays tribute to his friend and colleague Gavin Stamp, who passed away last week

‘The one thing you need to know,’ Gavin Stamp told me in a bibulous crush in The Bride of Denmark days after my joining the Architectural Press, ‘is that the only good architect is a dead architect.’ Coming from an architectural historian, this was both funny and true. The work of dead architects can be discussed openly and criticised. Live architects can be unforgiving and litigious. 

Gavin was famously outspoken, and even savagely indignant, yet never, I think, personally unkind in lacerating judgements made of buildings he thought second-rate or worse. In his ‘Young Fogey’ prime in the 1980s, he was expected to tilt his critical lance at ‘philistine’ designs by, among other ultra-moderns, Richard Rogers. And, yet, here he is at his unforgiving best, in The Spectator, skewering Quinlan Terry’s Maitland Robinson College at Downing College, Cambridge:

Great Classical architects, like Greek Thomson or Lutyens, acknowledged the transcendent importance of the continuous horizontal line. For Quinlan Terry to have pushed his conventional Georgian sashes into the level of the architrave between his front tetrastyle Doric portico based on the Portico of Augustus in Athens and his lateral projection copied from the Choragic Monument of Thrasyllus is not a piece of mannerism, a purposeful breaking of the rules; it is just an example of sheer incompetence which undermines the essential concept of Classicism as a controlling visual grammar.

Gavin’s fierceness in argument was founded on an ever-deepening arsenal of knowledge. An architect might disagree with him, but he knew his stuff. And how happily he shared this treasure trove. Gavin was the first person, beyond a habit of earnest Benedictine monks, I could talk to about Pugin, over whiskies, and as we talked, he offered exciting insights into the work of fellow Gothic Revivalists – the high, the low and middling – and this long before we talked about India, ‘Greek’ Thomson or steam railways.

Hugely enjoyable company, always willing to help, adored by the students he taught, funny and as kind privately as his public demeanour could seem belligerent in Cobbett-like ways, Gavin was equally happy working as a journalist as he was researching, exploring and writing in the guise of the distinguished historian he undoubtedly was.

What was so typical of Gavin, at the very end of his life, was the witty way in which he wrote, in The Oldie, of his sudden realisation that the cancer treatment centre he attended at Guy’s Hospital was in a new building by Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners: ‘that is, by the firm about whom I have long been very rude. But it is a building that works, and has, I think, made both staff and patients happier – as good architecture should. So hooray for the National Health Service, which – whether for better or for worse – is doing its best to keep me alive, at great expense.’

  • 2 Comments

Readers' comments (2)

  • An original by any stretch of imagination- a sad loss to the profession - unfortunately historians like academics are as far removed from the practicing type that their critique is no more than a sound byte on the short term but essential in connecting the dots in the bigger picture - pleased that he found tenacious analysis of the building type of the RSP’s hospital rewarding . Great architecture is not about style , it’s how well it is done . Need more of Gavin’s type . My sincere condolences to his family .
    Arif

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It’s a great loss, architects need outspoken critics to puncture their often overinflated egos. He wasn’t very nice about my work but it didn’t bother me.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.