Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Delicate or dull?

  • 1 Comment

Rogers’ design for the British Museum extension tries to be all things to all people, says Kieran Long

My first reaction to the images of Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners’ (RSHP) extension to the British Museum was pretty instant: Oh. That’s a bit dull.

It gets better the more you look at the plan – a rational arrangement, with five square-shaped volumes intersecting in probably very interesting ways to the west. The quality of the build will not be in doubt. A sum of £135 million buys you some really nice cast glass and the stone will be conservation-area-standard Portland Stone.

But has RSHP created a characterful exterior within this tricky historical context? I don’t think so. For all Rogers’ obsession with civic values in architecture, the practice hasn’t really produced anything of particular external character since the Bordeaux Law Courts, completed in 1998. The spectacular shed of Madrid’s Barajas Airport (2006) and the floating roof of the Welsh Assembly (2005) are great in their ways, but the practice just doesn’t seem to have a sense of composition in elevation these days.

This is revealed by an apparent confusion about what the identity of the British Museum extension is intended to be. There aren’t many other architects of the stature of RSHP which would couch their proposals in such laconic and apparently paradoxical terms. The building, the firm says, is both ‘monumental’ and ‘delicate’; ‘solid’ but transparent enough to allow ‘glimpses’ through; ‘quiet’ but ‘vibrant’. Sounds to me like it couldn’t make up its mind.

What will come out of it is a world-class museum facility, but a rather nondescript piece of architecture, with the most prominent gesture being what looks like a stair tower with a very thin, clip-on facade of stone matching the Robert Smirke original.

What with Foster’s Great Court, perhaps the legacy of British high-tech at the British Museum will be to prove that Rogers and Foster were always better at roofs than they were at walls.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • I think the scheme that Rogers are proposing should be commended. Its expression along the streetscape appears sympathetic to the existing. The restraint of its overall form, suggests that Rogers will have something interesting up their sleeve for the detailing of this building. I can't wait to see it!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.