Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

War of words breaks out over Birmingham's New Street scheme

  • Comment
Network Rail has reaffirmed its commitment to McAslan and Partners' Birmingham New Street scheme despite recent reports that Arup, which is behind a rival project, called for the designs to be shelved.

The international engineering giant has been quoted in the Birmingham Post calling for McAslan's New Street Station scheme to be scrapped amid claims that the station would be running at above capacity just 12 years after completion.

Arup is behind the rival Grand Central station scheme at Eastside, which is twice the size of the New Street proposals and three times as expensive.

The firm has claimed that the eastern approach to New Street, which bottlenecks 12 tracks into four, means that the station will be running over capacity by 2025.

A Network Rail spokeswoman said: 'We remain committed to the Gateway scheme and it is also backed by Advantage West Midlands, Birmingham City Council and Centro.

'The problem at the station now is the small concourse that is unable to cope with increasing passenger numbers. The Department for Transport's projections of passenger growth are robust and we think they are better positioned to judge this than Arup.

'The proposed plans we have for Birmingham New Street, we believe, will cater for up to a 150 per cent increase in numbers.'

She added: 'The other benefits are that Birmingham New Street is in a central location in Birmingham and the plans are estimated to be a third of the cost of Arup's Grand Central scheme.'

by Richard Vaughan

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.