Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Victorian lobbyists come out for Modernist Crystal Palace

  • Comment
The Twentieth Century Society (C20) has brought together an extraordinary coalition of conservationists in a desperate bid to save the Grade II*-listed Crystal Palace Sports Centre.

The group has won the support of the Victorian Society and the Garden History Society (GHS) - two organisations that would not normally involve themselves with such a building.

Landowner the London Development Agency (LDA) is currently working with the proposal, for which it has widespread local support, of demolishing the London County Council architects' 1963 building.

But opposition to the bulldozers is now growing. Victorian Society spokesperson Kathryn Ferry said her group would refuse to support the centre's demolition.

'The Victorian Society believes that imaginative plans for the country's most important municipal park are long overdue and we would encourage the LDA to take a holistic approach to this historic landscape,' she said.

The GHS is also lining up alongside C20 to save the building. GHS Principal conservation officer Jonathan Lovie said: 'The park today is depressing and barren, and the C20 Society proposals offer a well-balanced way forward.'

The society has also won the unlikely support of design consultant and Channel Four presenter Naomi Cleaver.

She said: 'The Crystal Palace Sports Centre is Grade II* listed for a reason, and that's because it's a majestic, grand building that has served the community magnificently.

'Just because it is in need of refurbishment, do we really need to knock it down and start again? Surely this is throwing the baby out with the bath water, not to mention even more costly.'

by Ed Dorrelland Rob Sharp

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.