Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Studio Egret West’s ‘excessive’ Hackney Wick scheme refused


Planners have rejected ‘excessive’ proposals by Studio Egret West to build homes on the site of an arts hub in Hackney Wick, east London

The London Legacy Development Corporation’s (LLDC) planning committee threw out the local practice’s highly-opposed scheme for 60 Dace Road, near the former 2012 Olympic Stadium.

Known as Swan Wharf, the area is currently used as a café-bar, a woodworking workshop, artists’ studios and creative office and event space.

Studio Egret West’s project, backed by developer Anderson Group, would have seen a mixture of demolition, refurbishment and new build work to provide 42 homes, 765m² of commercial space and 88 cycle spaces.

Objections came from a range of local people and bodies including Tower Hamlets Council, Save Britain’s Heritage and Historic England. Many of the concerns raised focused on fears of the new elements dwarfing existing structures and damaging the feel of the area.

The committee described the proposed six-storey Courtyard Building as being of ‘excessive height, scale, massing, detailed design and inappropriate siting’ and ruled it would cause harm to the appearance and setting of the adjacent 1912 Stable Block.

Meanwhile, a two-storey roof extension designed by Studio Egret West for the existing Warehouse Building was dismissed as ‘overly dominant’ and ‘top-heavy’. This extension would ‘unsuccessfully integrate with the existing building’ added the decision notice.

The volume of affordable housing offered and the loss of employment workspace was also criticised by the committee.

Planning officers had recommended refusal, having concluded that, although harm to the character of the Fish Island and White Post Lane Conservation Area was less than substantial, it was greater than could be outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme.

Studio Egret West declined to comment on the decision.

The practice says on its website: ‘Our proposals for Swan Wharf build upon the historical legacy of Fish Island. Through innovative design, they will provide a new chapter in the use of the site, providing new workspace to complement the existing offer, and much-needed, high-quality riverside residential [accommodation].’

‘The site contains existing buildings of varying degrees of heritage value. However, it is currently underutilised, with much of the existing building in urgent need of restoration having fallen into a state of disrepair.

’The proposals facilitate the retention and enhancement of the heritage buildings of greatest merit, an extension and a new mixed-use building.’


Readers' comments (3)

  • What the hell is going on! We obviously need more 2 storey back to back hovels and workhouses in the East End?!

    It’s turning into s bad spring for Egret West. And the planning inspector is about to report on their Chiswick Curve Application. Unfortunately the wrong building in the right place? It should be a Bosko Vertigale in view of World Heritage Kew Gardens?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is there an analogy between the activities of some architects and those people in Tokyo employed to stuff commuters onto rush-hour trains?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I appreciate the designs of SEW however, I have to agree with the decision made on this proposal. When I look at the characteristics of the existing building and then the new proposal I don't see any interpretations applied. Apart from the use of bricks - hardly original.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.