Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Select committee makes fresh demand for VAT exemption on 'historic buildings'

  • Comment
The government has been urged to reconsider its position regarding VAT on repairs to historic buildings by an influential parliamentary group.

According to the select committee looking into how best to protect and preserve the nation's heritage, the present tax regime 'works against [the] conscientious maintenance of historic assets.'

Under the current rules repairs to ageing buildings are not VAT-exempt - a policy which has meant it is often cheaper for developers to knock down and replace deteriorating gems than refurbish them.

The only exception at present is the Listed Places of Worship Grant scheme which allows for tax refunds on repairs to listed buildings owned by charitable bodies - a programme the group suggested should be extended to building preservation trusts and other charities.

The committee said: 'The present VAT regime for repairs distorts priorities, rewards neglect and works against conscientious maintenance of historic assets.

'The result can be either a slide towards demolition or a call on public funds for grant aid. We find it extraordinary that the Government did not take up the opportunity afforded by the EU earlier in the year to seek a carefully targeted relief... [when] opting in would have cost the government nothing.'

There were also suggestions that tax breaks should also be applied to some privately owned buildings. The report goes on: 'Proper consideration should be given to including heritage properties in private ownership where a clear public benefit can be demonstrated.

'The Treasury should recognise that the majority of potential private owner beneficiaries would not be high income earners; and many of the buildings at risk that would stand to benefit are not residential properties.'

Heritage Link, the representative body for a raft of conservation and preservation bodies, welcomed the report.

by Richard Waite

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.