Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Scottish government refuses to rescue Grade A-listed Cardross seminary


The Scottish Government has decided that the state will not look after Gillespie Kidd & Coia’s derelict seminary in Argyll and Bute

The government has accepted Historic Environment Scotland’s (HES) recommendation and declined a request from the Catholic Church to take St Peter’s Seminary in Cardross, near Dumbarton, into state care.

 A report by HES, commissioned by ministers, estimated the cost of maintaining the ‘one-off’ Category A-listed Modernist building, and making it safe for public access, could be more than £13 million over 20 years. The building, a target for vandals, has not been used since the early 1980s.

The HES report stated that the Archdiocese of Glasgow was likely to seek permission to demolish the building and that, without a developer interested in the ‘challenging and unique’ site, its retention will likely require government intervention. In that case, the report recommended ‘curated decay’ – managing the deterioration of the seminary while providing a degree of public access.

This option, according to the report, would require initial investment of £3.5 million. Beyond this, recurring costs of care over five years would be around £2.5 million, while a major intervention to the building costing a further £500,000 would be needed every five years over a 20-year period.

The report recommended ‘curated decay’ 

The report concluded: ‘We are particularly concerned by the considerable practical issues of access, safety and cost. Having considered all of the issues our advice is that we could not recommend that ministers intervene by bringing St Peter’s into care.’

A spokesman for the Archdiocese of Glasgow said it was ‘deeply disappointed’ by the Scottish Government’s decision and that the request to take the building into state control was ‘a last option’ for the structure.

‘For 40 years the archdiocese has been proactive in trying to find a new use for the building, co-operating with developers and planners to find a way forward,’ he said. ‘Every project has failed, due to costs or planning restrictions.

‘The archdiocese has even offered to give the building away without charge to any agency able to take it on.’

The Archbishop of Glasgow commissioned St Peter’s Seminary in 1958. Influenced by the architecture of Le Corbusier, the building, designed by Isi Metzstein and Andy MacMillan, won the RIBA Architecture award in 1967 and was listed in 1992. It fell into disrepair following its closure in 1980.

Since then, none of the suggestions for the future of the site have progressed. In 2011, developer Urban Splash walked away from a Gareth Hoskins-designed proposal.

In late 2017, the Glasgow-based arts charity NVA decided not to proceed with a project, overseen by Avanti Architects and McGinlay Bell, to stabilise parts of the structure and restore some of the interior for arts and educational use.

Following the closure of NVA in June 2018, the Archdiocese of Glasgow took back formal management of the site. In January this year, the archdiocese’s director of communications Ronnie Convery described the estate as ‘a huge albatross around our neck’.

However architects remained optimistic that the building could be saved. 

Fiona Hyslop, the cabinet secretary for culture, has written to the archdiocese to offer to facilitate discussion with interested parties on the seminary’s future.

She said: ‘The Scottish Government has no choice but to accept the recommendations from Historic Environment Scotland not to take St Peter’s Seminary into state care, due to the risk and cost to the public purse it would entail to the detriment of other properties in care.

‘We accept the report’s analysis that the only reasonable way forward for this site would be “curated decay” and I plan to convene a meeting with all key partners to see if there is a way forward collectively to deliver what looks to be the only viable option for St Peter’s.’

The spokesman for the Archdiocese of Glasgow said it noted the government’s recognition that ‘curated decay’ is perhaps the only remaining option. ‘We are disappointed that the opportunity to save one of Scotland’s great post-war buildings has been missed by the government,’ he said.

In February, Scottish laird John Bute pledged to commit funds from his charitable trust to save the building if the government would also step in. 

1966   St Peter s Seminary  c Glasgow School of Art Archives and Collections

1966 St Peter s Seminary c Glasgow School of Art Archives and Collections

Source: Glasgow School of Art Archives and Collections

St Peter’s Seminary in 1966


Readers' comments (4)

  • What a tragedy it would be if this modern masterpiece were to be demolished. Whilst I can understand the Scottish Government's reluctance to take on the liability surely this is a situation which cries out for a JV approach involving the Archdiocese, Scottish Government and multiple developers to take advantage of these glorious spaces and give new life to Cardross.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is a terrible culturally ignorant position by HES....and I suspect some sort of political reason here - if this was a ancient monument the debate would be different - this is just concrete haters in the HES!

    As for the church - the massive cash rich church....sell some land and fix your mistake:

    "The spokesman for the Archdiocese of Glasgow said it noted the government’s recognition that ‘curated decay’ is perhaps the only remaining option. ‘We are disappointed that the opportunity to save one of Scotland’s great post-war buildings has been missed by the government,’ he said."

    Really? Its the churches fault the place is in the state its in. Its the church that failed the project and failed to find a sustainable new use in the 1970/80's and its not the church and the Scottish Government who need to put some cash into St Peter, take up Jonny's offer and then get clever with the uses that could happen here.

    Wellbeing/Yoga/Youth Training/ Outdoor + leadership courses - Jesus just Airbnb the damn rooms its a rock star of a building that just needs a seed fund.

    Heck gift it to Urbansplash or Capital + Centric or General Projects or U+I to sort out, create a special housing SPD for some of the woodland surrounding it and let them make money long term but inject some cash now and save the only building of its type in the UK and one matched only by Corbusier's La Tourette.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps the Urban Splash proposal could be revisited, but with conversion to hotel / conference 'retreat' with the government as both partner and user. Surely this would best fit the original design with least architectural compromise.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ps: wasn't this how Mies's Tugendhat House in Brno was saved?

    (And it then hosted the negotiations on the breakup of Czechoslovakia).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.