Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

SAVE fails in High Court challenge against Piano’s Paddington Cube

  • Comment

The High Court has thrown out a legal challenge against Sajid Javid’s decision not to call in Renzo Piano’s controversial £775 million Paddington Cube

At the High Court today (29 November), Mrs Justice Lang dismissed the application by campaign group SAVE Britain’s Heritage, which was seeking a full judicial review of the communities secretary’s refusal to hold a public inquiry into the scheme.

The contentious west London project will see a 110-year-old former Royal Mail sorting office replaced with a 54m x 54m x 54m office block.

The successor to the doomed 72-storey Paddington Pole skyscraper proposal was approved by Westminster City Council last December despite opposition from heritage campaigners.

In February Javid issued an ‘Article 31 direction’ preventing the local authority from signing off the permission for the designs and allowing him time to examine whether the Sellar Property Group-backed project should be called in.

But a month later the Department for Communities and Local Government stated that there would be no public inquiry.

SAVE subsequently challenged Javid’s failure to give full and detailed reasons for not calling in the application – a breach of published policy announced in Parliament in 2001. However Mrs Justice Lang was not convinced.

Responding to the news, SAVE director Henrietta Billings said the judgment sent out a ’very negative message about open and accountable decision-making at the very highest levels of government’.

SAVE’s executive president Marcus Binney added: ‘In this case, scandalously, a published policy to give reasons, announced to parliament, has been overlooked and seemingly changed by civil servants without informing ministers.

SAVE is giving serious consideration to the grounds for appeal

‘The judge concluded that as decisions have been made on this basis since 2014, it can now be considered established policy. It is further remarkable that government officials only explained the change of policy in a late witness statement. SAVE is giving serious consideration to the grounds for appeal to the Court of Appeal provided by our lawyers.’

Piano’s proposed glazed cuboid replaced an earlier concept featuring a huge tower, which was ditched in summer 2016 following criticism from architects, Westminster Council, residents and campaigners concerned about its effect on the capital’s skyline.

But the change did little to appease either SAVE or Historic England, the government’s statutory adviser on the historic environment, which remained unhappy with the revised proposals.

As well as SAVE’s failed challenge, the Cube proposal is also subject to a separate application for judicial review from the Imperial College Hospital Trust, which runs the neighbouring St Mary’s Hospital, on the grounds that the plan could cause serious disruption to the existing ambulance route.

A spokesman for Sellar said: ’We note the court’s decision to dismiss SAVE’s application for a judicial review of the secretary of state’s decision not to give his reasons for not calling in the development of the former Royal Mail Sorting Office at Paddington. The court has also refused permission to appeal the decision.

’The scheme, being developed by Sellar Paddington on behalf of Great Western Developments, has been approved by Westminster City Council and the Mayor of London. We believe the development, which includes a £65million investment in transport infrastructure and public space, will greatly enhance the area around Paddington Station and be a catalyst for further rejuvenation in this part of London.’

  • Comment

Related files

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.