Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Row erupts as housing secretary blocks mayor’s London Plan

  • 2 Comments

Housing secretary Robert Jenrick has barred the London Plan from being published in its current state and launched a fierce attack on mayor Sadiq Khan’s housing record

In a damning letter, Jenrick slammed housing delivery in the capital as ‘deeply disappointing’ and said the mayor’s plan would deliver 52,000 homes a year rather than the 66,000 needed. 

Khan immediately hit back, accusing the Conservative minister of ‘riding roughshod’ over City Hall’s attempts to finalise the blueprint and criticising his ‘heavy-handed’ tactics. 

Jenrick’s letter also took Khan to task over the stalling of ‘critical strategic sites’ such as Old Oak and Park Royal, which he said lost £250 million of government funding because of the mayor’s ‘inability to work successfully with the main landowner’.

Meanwhile, Khan’s introduction of mandatory estate ballots had introduced ‘onerous’ conditions for regeneration projects which were jeopardising housing delivery, Jenrick said. This is despite all estates where ballots have taken place so far achieving positive votes. 

As for the London Plan, Jenrick accused the mayor of focusing on one-bed flats, a move he argued could exclude families from living in the capital. 

‘You should also be looking to deliver homes which people of different ages, backgrounds and situations in life can live in,’ he said. ‘Your plan tilts away from this, towards one-bed flats at the expense of all else, driving people out of our capital when they want to have a family.’

The mayor’s London Plan added ‘layers of complexity’ which will make development more difficult with policies on ‘things as small as bed linen’, Jenrick argued. 

He wrote: ‘Having considered your plan at length, my conclusion is that the necessary decisions to bring more land into the planning system have not been taken, the added complexity will reduce appetite for development further and slow down the system, and throughout the plan you have directly contradicted national policy.

‘As you know, by law you must have regard to the need for your strategies to be consistent with national policies. For these reasons I am left with no choice but to exercise my powers to direct changes.’

Jenrick is trying to run roughshod over the mayor’s efforts to finalise a London Plan

Jenrick has now issued a directive preventing the London Plan from being published without amendments.

A spokesperson for the Mayor of London said: ‘The mayor makes no apologies for trying to deliver genuinely affordable housing in the capital while at the same time protecting and enhancing the green belt. The secretary of state is trying to run roughshod over the mayor’s efforts to finalise a London Plan, which will deliver for Londoners and deliver on pledges from the mayor’s manifesto.

’The secretary of state needs to realise that London is best served by the government devolving further funding and powers to the capital to build the affordable homes it urgently needs, instead of taking this heavy-handed approach.’ 

  • 2 Comments

Readers' comments (2)

  • So after the Tory outer buroughs forced the stripping out of small sites from the early draft London plan, reducing land available for new housing, and PDR has been extended to grant a damaging licence to destroy embodied energy - now this. Clearly not what London voted for!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Jenrick conveniently forgets that this country has no legislation to control 'housing delivery' to the world of commodity markets, where it can be all too easily viewed as a secure and appreciating investment with no real incentive to make it genuinely available to house people.
    Short term rentals of the 'air bnb' variety surely don't count as housing - and neither should longer term rentals that exploit the shortage to gouge residents for all they're worth.
    London is surely at the epicentre of this iniquity.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.