Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Rotherhithe bridge consultation delayed as TfL tries to cut scheme’s cost

  • Comment

The public consultation for the new Rotherhithe Crossing has been delayed pending a value engineering exercise for the bridge option

Transport for London (TfL) investment delivery planning director David Hughes told a London Assembly budget and performance committee meeting £330 million had been set aside to fund the bridge. The bridge is now undergoing a value engineering exercise to see if it could be delivered within that budget.

According to the AJ’s sister title New Civil Engineer, another option for the crossing is a shuttle ferry link.

The value engineering exercise has delayed the start of consultation about the scheme. This was due to begin at the end of last month.

’The business plan has a funding provision of £330 million. As the work on the design has developed we’ve deferred the consultation to allow us to do more to do more work to get a cost which is in the funding provision,’ said Hughes.

The new river crossing for pedestrians and cyclists between Rotherhithe and Canary Wharf aims to relieve existing transport links and support growth in the Canada Water and Isle of Dogs areas.

Hughes said the value engineering exercise was looking at several aspects of the scheme including its alignment and Port of London Authority navigation requirements.

London mayor Sadiq Khan has previously stated at a Mayor’s Question Time that the bridge could be privately funded using a public private partnership (PPP) model. But Hughes and TfL director of city planning Alex Williams said this was not their understanding of how it would be financed.

’PPP has to rely on an income stream, like [the] Sivertown [crossing of the Thames] you have a toll,’ said Williams. ’In theory, you could toll that crossing, but I’m not aware of plans to do so.’

Williams said TfL would seek contributions from developers, but that the the amount they were likely to put in were ’not going to be huge’.

An alternative ferry scheme to the bridge is currently being developed by Thames Clipper which is estimated to cost a tenth of the cost of building the bridge.

Williams said to get planning powers to build the bridge TfL would have to review all of the options and do an ’appraisal on what is the most effective transport product to serve the needs of that area’.

In March this year, New Civil Engineer exclusively revealed the bridge, if built, will be the world’s longest lifting bridge at 90m high and spanning 180m across the Thames.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more