Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

RIBA Stirling Prize 2018 shortlist announced

  • 4 Comments

A trio of university-backed projects are among the six buildings shortlisted for this year’s RIBA Stirling Prize

Among them is MUMA’s ‘breathtaking’ Storey’s Field Community Centre and Nursery for the University of Cambridge, which has already been made the bookmakers’ favourite to be crowned the UK’s best new building of 2018.

The others are Henley Halebrown’s ‘intelligent’ and ‘high-quality’ student housing for Roehampton University and Niall McLaughlin Architects’ ‘exquisite’ Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre for Worcester College.

Shortlist in full (with odds by William Hill)

10/3 Storey’s Field Community Centre and Nursery, Cambridge by MUMA
7/2 Bloomberg, London by Foster + Partners
4/1 Bushey Cemetery, Hertfordshire by Waugh Thistleton Architects
4/1 New Tate St Ives, by Jamie Fobert Architects with Evans & Shalev
9/2 The Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre, Oxford by Níall McLaughlin Architects
11/2 Chadwick Hall, University of Roehampton, London by Henley Halebrown

William Hill spokesman Rupert Adams said: ‘This is another very strong field and, as it stands, we have little to choose between them.’

Of the shortlisted practices only Foster + Partners has won the prize before – in 1998 with the Imperial War Museum Duxford and in 2004 with the Gherkin.

It is, however, the first time in 11 years that the AJ100 top-ranked company has made it to the final six for the UK’s biggest architectural prize. Fosters’ last showing on the shortlist was in 2007 with its Dresden Station redevelopment. 

There are also returns for MUMA, which was shortlisted for the Whitworth Museum in 2015, and Níall McLaughlin Architects, which was shortlisted for Bishop Edward King Chapel in 2013 and Darbishire Place, Whitechapel in 2015.

But this is the first year that Waugh Thistleton, Henley Halebrown and Jamie Fobert Architects with Evans and Shalev have been shortlisted for the accolade.

Surprise omissions from the list include Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners’ Cheesegrater skyscraper in the City of London, Reiach and Hall’s Nucleus building and AL_A’s Victoria and Albert Museum Exhibition Road Quarter.

There is no place either for Maggie’s Oldham by dRMM Architects, winner of last year’s Stirling with its revamp of Hastings Pier.

Speaking about the shortlist, RIBA president Ben Derbyshire said: ‘Each of the projects on this year’s shortlist shows the power and payback of investing in quality architecture, illustrating perfectly how well-designed buildings are worth every penny and can exceed the expectations of the community they serve.

‘It doesn’t go unnoticed that half of the buildings were commissioned by UK universities, suggesting that parts of the higher-education sector value the importance of improving the quality of their buildings and estates to reward and attract students, staff and visitors, and to make a positive contribution to their local area.

‘It’s encouraging to see clients who recognise the broad range of benefits that can be achieved by working with skilled and resourceful architects, and I hope more public-sector organisations will follow their lead.

Derbyshire added: ‘This shortlist illustrates why UK architects and architecture are held in such high regard around the world. In these challenging and turbulent political times, we must celebrate how the UK’s architectural talent can help to improve local communities and their quality of life.

‘Years of thoughtful design, collaborative working and a desire to nurture the human spirit have resulted in six buildings of real integrity and purpose. I am sure they will continue to inspire those who experience them, for decades to come.’

The winner of the RIBA Stirling Prize will be announced on Wednesday 10 October 2018 at the Roundhouse in Camden, London.

The Architects’ Journal is the professional media partner for the RIBA Stirling Prize.

 

Judges’ citations in full

Bloomberg, London by Foster + Partners


Occupying a whole block within the city, this project is a large office building to house all of Bloomberg’s employees under one roof for the first time. Externally the building incorporates a covered walkway all round its perimeter. There is also a new street created, carving the building into two blocks connected by bridges. Commercial units for restaurants etc. are arranged at ground level. There is an external undulation in plan described by the architect as an expression of the movement around the building.

After entering the building one encounters some understandably very tight security, then one moves through an architectural procession to the lifts. This procession includes ‘the vortex’ which is an art piece, one of several throughout the scheme. The lifts – specially designed – take you to a mid-level floor where the main concourse / café space is located. Desks and workspaces are then distributed in clusters accessible from a winding curved ramp, which curls through the building linking the various levels.

The whole building, inside and out, is executed to a very high quality. Externally the building is of an appropriate scale to the surroundings. It seeks to create a dialogue with some very old neighbouring buildings and in that it is quite successful. The covered walkway represents a level of generosity towards the city.

Internally, the process of moving through the architectural procession and up in the lifts creates a completely immersive environment. The concourse level is very vibrant, buzzing with activity and isolated from its surroundings. There’s a sense of Willy Wonka about the space. It is here that the real success of the project starts to emerge. Everywhere you look there is an inventive detail. From the bespoke folded aluminium ceiling ‘roses’ to the magnetic floorboards. The aim of the building was to avoid standard office space and in this it succeeds.

Overall the project is a tour-de-force. This is the opposite of a quiet understated building. In fact, the multiplicity of invention at numerous levels is carried through with such conviction that you cannot fail but be impressed by it.

Read the building study here

 

Bushey Cemetery, Hertfordshire by Waugh Thistleton Architects

Bushey1 (c)lewis kahn

Bushey1 (c)lewis kahn

Source: Lewis Kahn

The architects, Waugh Thistleton, have a very strong, long-term relationship with the Jewish community. They have completed a number of synagogues prior to this project and the simplicity, austerity even, of the means and materials used in this project are a reflection of this mutual respect, trust and empathy. Every aspect of the building layout and progress through the landscape are in keeping with the spirit of the event.

In keeping with the Jewish idea of being buried very simply, in a cardboard coffin, simple clothes, the buildings carry through the idea of returning the body to the ground, “earth to earth, ashes to ashes”. In contrast with the plainness of the buildings, the landscape is almost lush. The cemetery is surrounded by a tree belt and a series of balancing ponds to capture the increased rainwater runoff fed by a clever drainage system.

The limited number of buildings, the simplicity of the forms and expressionist choice of materials all reflect the symbolism of burial to the Jewish community. An example of the care with which each element has been considered is the gentle slope of the floor in the Prayer Halls that tips the visitors forward along the route to the graves. This project will be just a stage in the ongoing process of enlarging the cemetery so that the community can continue to honour and protect their dead. The fact that the rammed earth walls of the prayer hall will return to the earth once the cemetery is full and has to be extended again, is a poetic response to the programme for the cemetery and the traditions of the Jewish faith.

Read the building study here

 

Chadwick Hall, University of Roehampton, London by Henley Halebrown

Chadwick hall 2730 nick kane pressimage 3

Chadwick hall 2730 nick kane pressimage 3

Source: Nick Kane

The scheme is set in the grounds of the Georgian grade II* listed Downshire House which itself borders on the LCC’s Alton West Estate (grade II* listed). The brief sought 210 en-suite student bedrooms. These are provided in three new buildings.

Each employs a distinct plan type -two are villas, the third a Modernist pinwheel plan. Two are paired around an existing historic sunken garden. The third lies on an axis with the sunken garden to the south of Downshire House, completing an ensemble with the House that creates a theatre for the students’ social life.

This is timeless architecture. Inspiring while remaining simple

This is a good example of timeless architecture. It is inspiring while remaining simple. The scheme’s success is also based on a skilful master plan with sensitive arrangement of the blocks within the landscape, existing listed building and the restored sunken garden. The concept is a nod both to Georgian architecture as well as to a Modernist block of flats to the Northwest boundary of the site. The design becomes a backdrop for the listed building and the sunken garden. It gives them the importance and provides a setting for social gathering. The main materials are limited to a

dark red brown brick and precast concrete, with a darker red brick which both relates to the listed building and yet remains subservient. The tall windows in all the blocks are for the bedrooms with wider ones for communal areas. The only exception is the large bay window which attempts to respond to the bay window of the listed building. The low cost of the building is not at all reflected in the external appearance of the scheme.

The panel felt that the architects managed to create a welcoming and calm space by careful master planning responding in turn to the street and the listed building structures as well as the wider landscape and the modernist building to the perimeter of the site.

Read the AJ Specification case study here

 

New Tate St Ives, Cornwall by Jamie Fobert Architects with Evans & Shalev

New tate st ives 2388 nick hufton pressimage 4

New tate st ives 2388 nick hufton pressimage 4

Source: Nick Hufton

The extended gestation of the reconfiguration and extension of the Tate St Ives has resulted in a building with more than twice as much gallery space which resolves the functional challenges of the original building, increases the car parking provision at the top of the site and creates an enhanced public route from top to bottom of the site. The visible manifestation of the new building is minimal and modest, underplaying its impact on the interior experience for visitors and staff.

Externally the most prominent feature is the faience clad loading bay – visible from Porthmeor Beach, the subtle greenish-grey ceramic turret sits quietly between Evans and Shalev’s original building and the housing adjacent. The gallery extension has been carved out of the hillside, connecting seamlessly to the existing galleries; the top lit space is capped by deep, in situ beams which create a rhythm and character very different in character to the 1990s spaces. From the loading bay, soaring etched-glass doors give access to a huge goods lift which connects all floors (also providing enhanced disabled access to the gallery) – provision of a new picture store and workshop also enhances functionality. A winding in-situ staff stair with lacquered steel handrail celebrates simplicity while also connecting a new, upper-level staff entrance to offices, meeting room and staff amenity which enjoy stunning seaward views. The granite and glass gallery roof lights emerge into a public landscape of granite paving and planting which echoes the nearby cliff tops.

A building has been delivered where there appeared to be no site available

The evolution of this iconic South West attraction has overcome huge challenges, navigating vociferous local stakeholders and significant site constraints. By architectural ingenuity, a building has been delivered where there appeared to be no site available, with minimal intrusion on an already crowded horizon. It has created an intriguing new public landscape and pedestrian connection from hilltop to beach and, with subtle reordering of the original gallery, it achieves a seamless environment to in which to enjoy art.

Find out more here

 

Storey’s Field Community Centre and Nursery, Cambridge by MUMA

Storey's field commu 2565 alan williams pressimage 3

Storey’s field commu 2565 alan williams pressimage 3

Source: Alan Williams

This is the very highest quality architecture. It shows how an architect can add joy, an enhanced experience of materials and human dimension to every part of a building. The spaces in the nursery are worthy of a much more sophisticated audience, but are always based around the scale and activities in each space. Where small windows are needed they are arranged in the pattern of constellations of stars (even with the correct orientation), where a decorative circular window from the enclosed garden is made out of a ventilation inlet grille, it is evidence of the skill, imagination and continuous attention to detail of the architect. This is a truly well-crafted building, where material or technology is only used where it is needed.

The Community Centre and Nursery are linked operationally so that a sense of space from views of the playground, daylight and ventilation are brought into the café but without compromising the privacy of the children. Where spaces have dual uses, like the external garden outside the wedding venue which can be used as a quiet reading room for the Nursery; the competing needs of the users are balanced and the management of the building is happy to make the extra effort (opening doors or moving furniture) to make it all work.

This is an example of the very best in British architectural design

The Community Hall itself has been designed to become a more important place in the new community at Storey’s Field, to become its civic centre or town hall. It offers opportunities for weddings, music concerts, funerals, political debate, which gives it a significance above and beyond a space for hobbies, exercise, local groups and kids parties. To address this enhanced symbolic value for the community, the architects stepped the building sidewards to address a longer view in the masterplan, and set it back to create a gathering space outside the Hall and a parents’ drop-off space outside the Nursery. To complete the sense of civic pride, the external walls of the Hall are lined with comfortable seats to stop and chat to neighbours while you wait to enter.

The inside of the Hall is a beautiful balance of function, sustainability (it is vented naturally using an underground labyrinth), acoustic performance and expression of materials. The patterned brickwork of the enclosing wall acts to break up the reflections of music or speech to provide a good acoustic, but also suggests patterns of geology in the surrounding landscape. The amount of daylight or the feel of the acoustics can be changed by simply dropping or rising blinds so users can control the environment without complex management systems. Even the access stair to the plant on the roof is via a sculptural spiral staircase that takes its part in performances.

This is an example of the very best in British architectural design. When it is this good it offers ideas, skill and care in ways that transform the human use and experience of this building at every opportunity.

Read the building study here

 

The Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre, Worcester College, Oxford by Niall McLaughlin Architects

The sultan nazrin sh 2176 nick kane pressimage 3

The sultan nazrin sh 2176 nick kane pressimage 3

Source: Nick Kane

The setting for this building is unbeatable. It is beside a perfectly-mown cricket pitch within the secluded, rambling and idyllic garden of one of Oxford’s most historic colleges. And there’s a lake nearby too.

To not only preserve but enhance this context would require a building of assured calm and grace. It would need to use materials with a tactile gravitas and be imbued with a timelessness which would make it feel as if it had always been there and need never leave. The Sultan Nazrin Shah Centre does all this and more.

It was not an easy path to get here: the college had an urgent need for the teaching facilities it contains, but had to prove that there was nowhere else in their capacious campus to accommodate them and demonstrate that they could build it without harming the floodplain, the adjacent trees or the matchless setting. It has taken time, unstinting application from the client and the procurement team, a generous donor prepared to cover the eye-watering build cost, a building team capable of the highest levels of craftsmanship and an architectural team capable of the very highest design quality.

The result is a building of extraordinary elegance

The result is a building of extraordinary elegance. In bald terms it is a relatively small single-storey teaching facility, with an auditorium, seminar rooms, a dance studio and ancillary facilities all arranged around a generous central foyer which opens onto a stepped terrace addressing the cricket pitch. But above and beyond this, every space is high-ceilinged and flooded with daylight, every element is designed and crafted to the most exacting tolerances and standards, and every part fits together sweetly from the radial brick pavers to the curved seats and huge oak doors of the auditorium up to the spaces themselves, formally arranged as discrete stone forms around which the forum flows.

The building is classical in spirit, with crisp proscenia and a slender stone stoa marching along the cricket pitch façade. However it is uncompromisingly modern in style, with smooth planes of stone and glass and minimal detailing. Yet there is nothing alien or mechanistic about it; in fact, it is surprisingly traditional in its craftedness, relying on stonemasons, plasterers and joiners at the very top of their game. It is the natural materials, superbly honed, that ground the building and make it belong. It is the architectural design – the timeless pursuit of ordering space and light and form – that makes it a thing of pure joy.

Read the building study here

Read next: the AJ’s verdict on this year’s shortlist

  • 4 Comments

Readers' comments (4)

  • Phil Parker

    Well done.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Phil Parker

    However, could the RIBA undertake a financial audit of all shortlisted buildings?

    Would be nice to avoid the Stirling Prize shambles of 2017 that saw a project win that had no financial model or apparent purpose and then proceeded to file bankruptcy before being flogged to a middle eastern commercial pier operator.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What's happened? Are Architects suddenly frightened by colour, or appearing in 'bad taste'. or have they just forgotten how to apply it well? All those architects and designers who went before and showed us how to do it, Mackintosh, Will Alsop, Piers Gough, James Stirling, William Morris, Gaudi, Ricardo Bofill, Richard Rogers, Amanda Levete...………. Where is their impact on this year's shortlist?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is this the beige Stirling Shortlist? If so please could I see the colour Stirling Shortlist?
    Gaudi, Will Alsop, James Stirling, Amanda Levete, Ricardo Bofill, Richard Rogers, Mackintosh, William Morris, Piers Gough, ………..not much beige there.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs