Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Project manager appointed for Mac restoration

  • 1 Comment

Gardiner and Theobald has been appointed as project manager on the restoration of Charles Rennie Mackintosh’s fire-damaged Glasgow School of Art

The firm will work with the yet-to-be-appointed architect and the Glasgow School of Art’s senior project manager Liz Davidson on the project.

The architects still vying for the work include conservation specialists Avanti and Purcell, local firms Page\Park and LDN Architects and John McAslan + Partners – which restored Mackintosh’s last major commission, at 78 Derngate in Northampton (AJ 20.11.03).

The five teams are expected to make presentations of the plans for bringing the 1909 Art Nouveau landmark back to its former glory in the coming weeks and a winner will be announced next month.

The project, which could cost up to £35 million, has been the subject of controversy with a number of architects arguing a new modern library should be built rather than an exact replica of the original, while in the aftermath of the fire, a number of architects, including shortlisted John McAslan, said the library should be replicated.

Charles Rennie Mackintosh’s masterpiece was devastated by fire in May with the famous library almost entirely destroyed.

David Logue, senior partner of Gardiner & Theobald, said: ‘Watching the footage of the fire at the Mack on 23 May last year was heartbreaking, like witnessing the pain and suffering of an old friend. The building truly is one of Scotland’s national treasures and we are honoured that Gardiner & Theobald have been entrusted to manage its restoration.’

Previous story (AJ 12.11.14)

Mac restoration job drums up global interest

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Regarding next month's decision on the choice of architect, I wonder if this will also determine whether replication or modernisation wins the day?
    Architects of great merit have argued for both options, and hopefully there's no element of the 'arrogant' and 'egotistical', that Ken Shuttleworth sees in some architects, at play here.
    The claim that 'repro' would be a sham, without the patina of age, is surely a bit specious, if it's recreating really unique design - and the patina of age would surely evolve, not be replicated, please.
    Didn't the post-WW2 reconstruction of the historic fabric of some European cities teach us the value of replication - for example Dresden, and Gdansk?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs