Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Planning row concludes with victory for Sandgate scheme - images

  • Comment
A scheme at the centre of a major planning row in Kent has won permission from an ODPM planning inspector.

The project, by CTM Architects - for a relatively small residential project on the coast in the town of Sandgate - had attracted major local opposition.

The opposition groups claimed it would damage the setting of the historic town and the neighbouring 16th-century Sandgate Castle.

But the planning inspector supported the project, which had the backing of English Heritage, insisting that the designs were of a high standard and respected the sensitive context.

When the project is complete it will include two residential buildings, one which will face the seafront and one which will respond to the town's streetscape.

Guy Holloway, senior partner at CTM Architects, said the inspector's decision was important not just for the project but for the rest of Kent and the country. 'The project represents a landmark planning decision for the region and for the UK as a whole.

'The design stands testament to the possibility for high-quality, well-considered, visionary architecture to win plaudits in even the most sensitive and historic of locales and we are delighted to have won the planning permission.

'This is an exceptional project and one of which we at CTM Architects are extremely proud,' Holloway added.

by Ed Dorrell

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.