Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Planner architect Vincent Lacovara: ‘Why I’m leaving Croydon for Enfield’

Photo vincent lacovara with fans crop
  • 1 Comment

Planner, architect and leader of Croydon Council’s placemaking team Vincent Lacovara talks to the AJ about why he is leaving the south London borough for new challenges north of The Thames

Why have you decided to make this switch? And why now?
I’ve been at Croydon Council for 15 years and have seen plans evolve from visions through to detailed, joined-up plans, planning consents and projects being built and enjoyed by people; with more exciting projects on their way. Croydon has real momentum now.

The council has an ambitious leadership and many talented officers making great things happen, including many who come from a design background. It feels like the right time for me to hand over to my team and I am confident that I am leaving the work in very good hands. Enfield presents me with fresh challenges in a new place and the opportunity to continue to demonstrate the value of good design and proactive planning.

What will be your role at Enfield?
I will be the new head of planning

What will be the first thing you will do when you arrive?
I am looking forward to meeting and getting to know my new team and am also keen to explore Enfield’s places and get under the skin of the borough: its history, landscape, communities, economy and developments – past, present and those proposed for the future.

Will you be needing the help of architects in that new role?
Enfield has a brilliant new place and design quality panel, which includes architects as well as other built environment professionals – much like Croydon’s place review panel. These panels are critical to encouraging excellence across all kinds of development that contribute to the success of places.

Architects should be actively involved in shaping planning policy and guidance

Architects will also obviously be involved in designing new developments coming forward in the borough but should also be actively involved in shaping planning policy and guidance and the evidence that underpins it.

What are you most proud of having achieved at Croydon?
I am proud of the team that I have helped build over the past decade, the design team culture that I have helped engender and the work that the team has produced and facilitated; from developing planning policies to helping enable high-quality schemes – big and small – through the development management process. I am particularly proud of the series of collaborative masterplans that my team led and the projects that have been catalysed by them, including a series of public realm and infrastructure improvement projects and major developments in places like East Croydon and Cane Hill in Coulsdon.



What advice would you give to whoever takes over your role?
Love Croydon.

What lessons do you think you can transfer from Croydon to Enfield?
At Croydon I have learnt at first hand the value and importance of proactive and progressive public planning and have developed a huge respect and admiration for planners and planning as a profession.

I have also learnt the importance of putting the effort in to understand what is special about existing places; to assume nothing; to continue to challenge one’s self to look hard and be prepared to be surprised by what you find.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Phil Parker

    I’m sorry but planning in Croydon is far from the sweet vision of ok-ness that’s portrayed.

    Croydon residents feel disenfranchised from Planning. Planning officers ignore their concerns and Planning Committees are run like kangaroo courts.

    The most unscrupulous of developers are given free reign against the backdrop of wholly politicised planning process.

    I’d call that a fundamental failure of planning at local level. Nothing to crow about.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs