Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Nicholas Grimshaw backs ‘Ship’ listing bid

  • Comment

Architect Nicholas Grimshaw has said he will ‘wholeheartedly’ back any campaign to list the practice’s award-winning Western Morning News HQ and printworks in Plymouth

Last week the Twentieth Century Society submitted an ‘urgent spot listing application’ for the former headquarters building after it emerged its owner – The Daily Mail – had submitted an application to demolish the landmark.

But Grimshaw, 75, has hit out at plans to flatten the £33.5 million building which was completed just 22 years ago.

The founder of AJ100 practice Grimshaw Architects said: ‘We would be very happy to support anyone who is considering a new purpose for this building, while we would wholeheartedly back any attempt to grant it listed status.

‘My belief is that architecturally speaking the former Western Morning News Headquarters is an important building.

‘At the time it was erected with enormous enthusiasm by architect and client alike and went on to win a number of awards.’

He added: ‘Despite no longer fulfilling its original use, the building still offers a beautiful enclosure and strong structural bones which invite a number of future uses’.

The iconic building, which was completed in 1993, has stood empty since local title Western News moved out in July 2013.

Nicknamed The Ship, the hillside structure houses 5,671m² of offices and a further 6,459m² of production space and won Grimshaw a RIBA Award in 1994.

The steel and glass building was planned to enable all production and editorial areas to be located on one level. The office space wraps around a full-height central atrium.

According to the planning documents, the building’s re-use is ‘unviable’ and it is currently in ‘a generally poor state of repair and is highly unsustainable’.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.