Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navin Shah: 'The rash of tall buildings popping up across London must stop'


It’s a cruel irony to see skyscrapers being built which Londoners cannot afford, says architect and London Assembly Labour member Navin Shah

Everyone knows that house prices and rents are rising out of the reach of ordinary Londoners because there just isn’t enough supply. That’s why it’s a cruel irony to look across the capital’s skyline and see it littered with cranes busily constructing skyscrapers with flats that the vast majority of Londoners will never be able to afford.

The insatiable demand for luxury housing is barely putting a dent in London’s housing crisis

Mayor Johnson is quick to point out that the 200 planning applications for tall buildings he’s allowed could provide around 35,000 homes. But when sales prices range from £420,000 for a studio flat in Croydon’s Saffron Square to £3.25 million for a three-bed in St Georges Wharf, it’s clear that very few of these homes will help to meet London’s desperate housing need. Instead, they will be safety deposit boxes for investors, many of whom will never even set foot in these properties. The insatiable demand for luxury housing is barely putting a dent in London’s housing crisis.

Others argue that contributions from developers are worth the vandalism of London’s skyline. But the reality is that developers are getting away with paltry sums. The 58- and 42-storey towers that the Mayor waved through last month, for example, were part of the £700 million One Nine Elms project – despite including a 5* hotel and luxury flats, the developer claimed they could only afford around 11 per cent affordable housing and a minor contribution off-site.

The Mayor’s designation of suburban areas only increases the threat of excessively high buildings

The problem isn’t confined to central London alone. In my constituency of Brent and Harrow, neighbourhoods’ well-established and historic suburban characters have not been given a second thought by developers rushing to put up monstrosities like the Hendon Waterside development that will tower over the previously pristine SSSI status Welsh Harp site. The Mayor’s designation of traditionally suburban areas like Harrow and Bromley as Opportunity Areas only increases the threat of excessively high buildings due to very high densities required to meet the housing targets. My experience of Outer London shows the local communities tend to reject out of hand tall buildings (anything over ten to fifteen stories) due to the concerns about loss of local views and detriment to the suburban character.

The rash of tall buildings popping up over the capital, including in Outer London, must stop. They are not sustainable, have unacceptable impact on local character and views, and are not fit for purpose as they are unaffordable and fail to meet London’s housing need. That’s why I’m pleased the London Assembly Planning Committee, on which I sit, has begun an investigation into how London should respond to this trend. The Skyline campaign doesn’t offer all the answers, but at least it’s got the conversation started.


Readers' comments (2)

  • Kunal Manani

    There you go... another one!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why do you always show a shot of strata insinuating it was built for wealthy people? Despite all the unfounded negative press it contains over 100 affordable apartments which are ,
    Managed by family mosaic housing trust. It also has apartments for rent only! The market apartments were sold at manageable prices, under £250k for 1 beds and around £320k for 2 beds. Please don't tarnish this building any more with your biased, un researched information. Please for once, AJ, pick the phone up, do some proper journalistic research and get your facts right!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more