Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Liverpool gives thumbs up to towers by Hodder and Brock Carmichael

  • 1 Comment

Liverpool City Council has approved two high-rise schemes on its historic waterfront – a 31-storey skyscraper by Brock Carmichael and a 15-storey building by Hodder + Partners 

Plans for the £55 million project by Brock Carmichael, known as Hive City Docks, include 278 flats and a restaurant on the top floor. Hodder’s scheme, called Plaza 1821 features 105 new flats.

The projects will sit directly next to a 34-storey private rented sector (PRS) residential tower, dubbed The Lexingtondrawn up by Falconer Chester Hall, which was granted planning permission last September.

Both of the newly approved proposals sit within Peel Land and Property’s controversial £5.5 billion Liverpool Waters development, which was granted outline planning permission in 2012.

The major project, masterplanned by Chapman Taylor, includes 9,000 homes, offices, shops, a cruise terminal, cultural buildings and restaurants. It is also set to feature a new stadium for Everton FC, after the council supported a deal to bring forward the scheme in March.

Hive city docks, plaza 1821 and the lexington

Hive city docks, plaza 1821 and the lexington

(from left to right) Hive City Docks by Brock Carmichael, Plaza 1821 by Hodder + Partners and the Lexington by Falconer Chester Hall

Lindsey Ashworth, director of development at Liverpool Waters, said: ’Our vision is to create a waterfront for the world and these two developments will take us one step closer to achieving that. Both of these developments will deliver quality living space and places for people to enjoy to the spectacular views on offer here.

’2017 has been the year when a lot of the work we’ve been doing behind the scenes has come to fruition and we are hopeful of more exciting announcements in the near future.’

The two schemes are part of one of five new neighbourhoods at Liverpool Waters. This one, called Prince’s Dock, will provide more than 69,667m² of office space and more than 1,000 waterfront apartments in buildings up to 44 storeys high. There will also be a 7 hectare public park.

Peel’s vision – which first emerged more than a decade ago – for the 60ha of former docklands has been heavily criticised by heritage campaigners.

In 2015, UNESCO called for a moratorium on new building work across the central Liverpool waterfront area, due to the potential damage it could cause to the historic environment.

Earlier this year the organisation went further and threatened to strip the city of its coveted World Heritage status in 2018 unless the government and local authority radically improved their supervision of the Liverpool river front.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Geoff Williams

    Lets hope that due vigilance is given to fire protection in this high rise development. Fire rated electrical standards and codes should not be linked to the minimum requirements. All fire rated and life saving applications must have a 2 hour fire rated cable to maintain the electrical supply. This what the BS 6387 fire standard means:
    BSI Statement.
    “BS6387 does not attempt to provide any guidance as to the suitability of cables to any given installation, or purpose. The choice of a particular cable to given installation and purpose must take into account all relevant building, electrical installation and fire regulations and codes pertaining to the building concerned, also taking into account the survival time required for the particular circuits the cable will serve. Such a choice must be made by suitably qualified persons having the requisite expertise to make those decisions and is a far wider issue than the use of just one standard". Point made.
    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.