Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Leading Israeli claims RIBA president did not back suspension motion


RIBA president Stephen Hodder does not back the RIBA motion to suspend Israel from the International Architects Union (UIA), the Israeli Association of United Architects (IAUA) has claimed

The IAUA and RIBA have been at loggerheads following RIBA Council’s decision in March to support ex-RIBA president Angela Brady’s call for the suspension of Israel from the UIA in protest at architects who accept commissions in the Occupied Territories.

Earlier this month Hodder met with Yitzhak Lipovetsky-Lir, former president of the IAUA and its international ambassador, at Portland Place in an effort to smooth over relations between the two bodies.

After the meeting, which was also attended by RIBA international vice president Peter Oborn, Lipovetsky-Lir said: ‘He [Hodder] and vice president Oborn said they are not supporting the motion; absolutely.’ 

‘I felt they were caught by surprise by the way the council voted,’ he added.

The latest disclosure follows claims made by Lipovetsky-Lir, prior to his recent head-to-head with Hodder, in which he told the AJ that the UIA had already decided to ignore the RIBA motion:

‘I have spoken personally to the president of the UIA, Professor Albert Dubler,’ said Lipovetsky-Lir, ‘and he has told me that they [UIA] have rejected the RIBA motion. They are not going to deal with it anymore.

‘I don’t know why they have rejected it; he didn’t tell me,’ he added.

Referring to the recent meeting with Hodder, Lipovetsky said that the RIBA president had revealed the institute’s council would be holding a meeting on the 19 June and that the issue ‘would be on the agenda’.

Brady and her supporters had expected the motion to be debated at the UIA’s forthcoming annual convention in Durban, South Africa this summer (7 August). But a spokeswoman for the UIA said: ‘[The expulsion]of the Israeli Association of United Architects, is not part of the next UIAGeneral Assembly’s agenda.’

The RIBA maintians said it has yet to receive ‘a formal response on the matter from the UIA’ and refused to comment directly on Lipovetsky’s comments, but confirmed that ‘RIBA Council will be updated on the resolution at its next meeting’.

Angela Brady said she had heard nothing from the UIA but added that she stood by her decision to bring the motion: ‘It is a very sensitive issue, but it is very important and has to be discussed.’


Readers' comments (2)

  • Of course Stephen Hodder does not back the motion - it was based on glaring factual errors:


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No Jonathan Hoffman -it is your hate-sites like CiF Watch, that are full of factual errors and libellous nonsense. The real facts are the myriad reports from Israel's own human rights organisations like B'Tselem, ICAHD, Adalah and BIMKOM and the EU, the UN , Amnesty International whose umpteen reports have condemned Israel' breaches of international law and human rights, its racism, and its misdemeanours, including 65 UN Resolutions that Israel has flouted since its inception. As far as CiF watch goes all this evidence is turned inside out and upside down, Black is white and white is black. This is the sort of 'hasbara' (propaganda) pervaded by the Israel lobby- who are trying very hard to intimidate, bully and divert the democratic processes of the RIBA and the UIA which will have to act according to the ethical standards and Resolutions laid down by them, and not the dictates of the Israel lobby. Justice and ethics will win- but these are concepts that are beyond the sort of misrepresentations that you present.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.