Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Khan and Goldsmith drop out of mayoral housing debate

Mayoral candidates: Zac Goldsmith and Sadiq Khan
  • 1 Comment

Labour’s Sadiq Khan has followed Conservative contender Zac Goldsmith in pulling out of tonight’s mayoral election debate at the RIBA on housing 

Khan and Goldsmith had been lined up to speak alongside the other three main candidates in the race to replace London mayor Boris Johnson at the event at Portland Place.

It is understood the hustings will still go ahead, with London Assembly member Val Shawcross standing in for Khan - who withdrew yesterday - and a Conservative representative lined up to speak for Goldsmith who had previously said he couldn’t attend.

The debate, which was organised jointly by a number of leading built environment institutions including the RTPI and RICS, will focus on housing, infrastructure and growth for ‘London 2020 and beyond’. It was originally to be chaired by broadcaster Simon Jenkins - however he also withdrew and Evening Standard columnist Rosamund Irwin has come in as his replacement.

The event is part of a series of debates with the candidates in the run-up to the election on 5 May. Each will look at ’different planning related areas of interest’ including London’s ’environmental resilience’ and the ’economics of devolution’.

The pair’s withdrawal from tonight’s clash (16 February) was widely condemned on social media.

Some commentators blamed the RIBA’s stance on the Garden Bridge - the institute wants the project halted to allow a full investigation into its procurement - for Khan and Goldsmith’s decision not to attend.

Goldsmith has publicly backed the controversial Thomas Heatherwick-designed project and, while Khan initially had his doubts over the £175 million scheme, he too has recently said he would support the bridge if its procurement was found to be above board. 


  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • To the twitterati - there's all the difference in the world between Sadiq and Zac jumping into the populist (but indefensibly grubby to anyone who can see) froth surrounding Joanna, Boris and some diligent tax avoiders and their hefty (and costly) Thames folly, and these ambitious politicians diving into the massive car crash that constitutes housing provision in London.
    They don't even seem to have clocked that Boris's TfL initiative to partner with the big developers in realising the value of spare TfL land is seemingly ignoring the surely widespread possibilities for economically 'unlocking' TfL's stock of 'leftover' plots - too small to attract the big property players - for affordable housing along the the lines of those brilliant initiatives by Walter Segal and the self-builders in Lewisham thirty years ago. The current exhibition at the AA (and the new project in Lewisham) should be an education to those who consider themselves the 'movers and shakers' in London, but is it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more