Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Kerslake mulls legal action to stop Right to Buy extension


The new chairman of Peabody Homes, Bob Kerslake, has not ruled out legal action against the government’s plan to extend Right to Buy

The former head of the civil service warned the housing association would look at challenging the controversial new government policy - which will allow housing association tenants to buy their homes - if talks with ministers fail.

Speaking at a public meeting at the London Assembly about the capital’s social housing situation, Kerslake said he hoped to engage with ministers including the secretary of state for Communities and Local Government, Greg Clark, over the details of changes affecting housing associations announced in the Budget.

Kerslake is particularly concerned about the financial impact the policy will have on housing associations’ finances and building programmes.

He said: ‘This policy has difficulty both in principle and practice - we will see a significant loss of affordable housing which will be very difficult to replace.

‘We should try to engage with ministers, however we haven’t ruled out taking legal action.

These aren’t the government’s assets to sell off

He added: ‘When Peabody was founded George Peabody put in about half a million pounds to build homes for the poor in London. That’s the equivalent of around a billion pounds now.

‘The point is that [these aren’t] the government’s assets to sell off.’

Kerslake advocated exploring alternatives to the current Right to Buy policy, which offers a cash discount on the market value of homes, and instead allow the government to offer equity loans which would be paid back after an initial five-year interest-free period.

Kerslake’s comments came during the second of two committee meetings held at the Assembly in which housing experts from London’s borough councils raised a number of concerns about the new policies, including the potential impact on the level of social homes in the capital and a potential outflow of money to other parts of the country as homes are sold off.

James Murray, executive member for housing and development at the London Borough of Islington warned the changes announced in the Budget could have a serious impact on the council’s ability to deliver housing in the future. He said: ‘It would be a real threat and could end our new build programme as every new home, once completed, are built to a high standard. It could mean that they are above the threshold and would have to be sold.’

Philip Glanvillecabinet member for housing at the London Borough of Hackney said: “We’ve all got our own plans to deliver affordable housing and this - along with other policies the government has introduced -  has dropped a bomb on those plans, we are seeing a collapse in supply of social housing, even in Boroughs which are building as fast as they can.’

Tom Copley, chair of the housing committee, said: ‘Most people want to be able to own their own home – but as we heard from experts across the board today, there is a risk that this policy might make London’s housing crisis even worse.

 ‘As the government develops its plans it must ensure it does not penalise councils and housing associations: they are vital in boosting London’s housing supply - especially affordable homes.

 ‘London has its own affordable housing crisis and should not be used as a cash-cow for funding right-to-buy in other parts of the country.’


Readers' comments (2)

  • There's surely a case for concerted legal action by a whole range of affordable housing providers who are going to be shafted in the populist (read selfish) interests of one political party.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Right to Buy needs to be extended to hotel rooms, school places, seats on trains, political parties... oh, that last one's already been implemented

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs


Do you want the latest jobs emailed to you?
Sign up for job alerts.

AJ Jobs