Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

John Callcutt writes to Hazel Blears

  • Comment
John Callcutt has written to Communities Secretary Hazel Blears, urging her to support Lord Howarth's proposed changes to the Housing and Regeneration Bill. His full letter can be read below.

Dear Secretary of State,

Following my Review of Housebuilding Delivery for your predecessor Ruth Kelly, I have been following the progress of the Housing and Regeneration Bill. In particular the amendments on design quality proposed by Lord Howarth.

My review placed great emphasis on the need to create market-driven solutions to such challenges as volume and quality. At a time when trading conditions are difficult, the pressures on the housebuilding sector to cut corners and make economies on design and quality have never been greater. We are, I believe, at a tipping point and need to move decisively to offer housing deliverers a commercially realistic way of delivering quality, cost effectively.

In many locations, particularly those in urgent need of regeneration, quality is simply not cost effective. Purchasers cannot afford to pay a premium for quality and too little weight is given to high-quality applications in the determination of planning applications.

The imposition of an obligation on the part of the Homes and Communities Agency to improve design quality, coupled with the creation of design review panels, would create a commercial incentive for developers to make the changes to their business processes that are needed to bring about a positive step change in design.

In particular the establishment of design panels, whose conclusions were a material consideration in the determination of planning, would tilt the commercial balance in favour of quality. The additional costs and overheads implicit in quality design would be more than offset by quicker consents and fewer appeals. The converse would also apply.

The proposed amendments by Lord Howarth would create clear commercial incentives for developers to deliver your policy objectives on quality.

I therefore urge you to support Lord Howarth’s proposed amendments.

Yours sincerely,
John Callcutt CBE

Chair, Callcutt Review of Housebuilding Delivery

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.