Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Jenrick faces judicial review over Holocaust Memorial call-in

  • 2 Comments

Housing secretary Robert Jenrick is headed to the high court to defend his handling of the planning application for the proposed Holocaust Memorial by Ron Arad and Adjaye Associates

The London Gardens Trust has applied for a judicial review of Jenrick’s decision to allow his junior colleague, housing minister Christopher Pincher, to determine the fate of the application.

The application for a memorial and visitor centre in the Grade II-listed Victoria Tower Gardens was called in by Jenrick in November – hours before Parliament was dissolved and three months before Westminster Council unanimously rejected the scheme in a symbolic, but redundant, vote.

The application for the proposed new landmark was submitted in 2018 by the UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation, an organisation sponsored by Jenrick’s department, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG).

Campaigners are concerned that Pincher will be unable to decide neutrally on the application, given his senior colleague Jenrick’s close association with the project.

In February Jenrick said he was ‘implacably committed’ to building the memorial in Victoria Square Gardens, and last month it emerged he had called in the application following meetings with board members of the UK Holocaust Memorial Trust.

‘The issue for the High Court is whether Pincher, the decision-maker, is lawfully insulated from his boss Jenrick, who has applied for planning permission: we don’t think so,’ said solicitor Richard Buxton, who represents the London Gardens Trust.

A spokesperson for MHCLG said it could not comment on live legal proceedings, but said: ‘All planning decisions taken by ministers are taken in line with published propriety guidance, which states that planning decisions must be made solely on the basis of valid planning matters.’

She added: ‘A public inquiry will be held and overseen by an independent planning inspector. The Housing Minister will make the final decision on the application taking into account the inspector’s recommendation.’

The location of the memorial faces opposition from campaigners including Jewish leaders and a former Archbishop of Canterbury, as well as The Royal parks and UNESCO.

Jenrick has recently been in the headlines for his controversial role in planning controversy surrounding the 1,500-home Westferry Printworks scheme.

Documents released last month reveal Jenrick was ‘insistent’ on pushing through the project to save its backer, Conservative party donor Richard Desmond, £45 million.

Jenrick had previously denied there was any ‘actual bias’ behind his contentious approval for PLP’s £1 billion east London scheme, against the planning inspector’s advice. His unexpected decision came just 24 hours before Labour-held Tower Hamlets Council increased its community infrastructure levy rates on 15 January.

It has since emerged that Jenrick had sat next to developer and media magnate Desmond at a Conservative party fundraising dinner in November; that Desmond had brought up his development company Northern & Shell’s Westferry Printworks scheme at the dinner; and that Desmond had gifted the party £12,000 just two weeks after Jenrick’s approval.

Last month the government admitted Jenrick’s approval was ‘unlawful by reason of apparent bias’ and the housing secretary’s planning permission was subsequently quashed.

  • 2 Comments

Readers' comments (2)

  • The Holocaust Memorial Trust would appear to have become - to all intents and purposes - a government quango (?), given the way that it's presented on the MHCLG website. This site claims that the project's fate will be decided by the Independent Planning Inspector - but omits to note that the ministry can ignore that decision as simply 'advice'.

    For the minister - Jenrick - to have called in a project that he was actively pushing for is more than disgraceful, it's disastrous, because the project has become associated with underhand manipulation of the planning process by his fellow promoters.
    They seem to have forgotten the significance of the cause and to have behaved as if they are 'shoving' to get some hugely profitable property development the nod against the protests a bunch of whingeing nimbies.

    The concept of the holocaust memorial has become tainted by this grubby manoeuvring, and needs rescuing by the identifying of a really appropriate site rather than one that's attractive to politicians keen to gain kudos by association with such a laudable cause.

    The tranquil haven of Victoria Tower Gardens, with all its memorials and memories, will hopefully survive our current crop of politicians, if we live in a fair and equitable society - and the scourge of anti semitism will be denied a cause to rally around.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's simple.
    He needs to held accountable.
    He also need to go.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more