Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Hopkins’ controversial plans for ITV HQ approved

hopkins itv hq
  • 1 Comment

Hopkins’ plans to redevelop ITV’s headquarters and studios on London’s South Bank have been approved by councillors despite warnings from conservationists that the proposals will ‘seriously compromise’ the high-profile riverside site

Lambeth Council’s planning applications committee granted planning permission for the proposal to demolish CH Elsom & Partners’ 1974 London Television Centre and replace it with two towers of 31 and 14 storeys on the same site.

The scheme – which will go to the Mayor of London for a final decision – provides about 44,400m² of offices, 3,600m² of television studios, 210m² of retail space and 213 homes on the high-profile plot between Waterloo and Blackfriars bridges.

The AJ reported last month that The Twentieth Century Society had written to Lambeth Council objecting to the scheme, partly on grounds of increased height.

Meanwhile Historic England warned of an impact on views of St Paul’s Cathedral from Westminster Pier.

But planning officers recommended approval of Hopkins’ proposals.

They said a ’slightly adverse impact’ on the view of St Paul’s due to ‘loss of sky’ would be outweighed by the scheme’s public benefits. A planning report also said officers were ’supportive of the proposal’s scale and layout, which would not appear dominant in the townscape’.

It added: ’Officers are strongly supportive of ITV’s intention to return to the Cultural Quarter on the South Bank in a new headquarters building, which provides both offices and television studios. ITV is considered to represent an important bridge between the other existing cultural uses within the area, such as the National Theatre and the Royal Festival Hall.’

However, the approved scheme will face extra viability scrutiny from the Greater London Authority (GLA), because it only offers 10 per cent affordable housing.

City Hall is set to use recently adopted planning powers to review the scheme as it progresses, in order to get closer to the mayor’s target level of 35 per cent of new homes being affordable.

A report by the GLA said the scheme’s proposal for 22 on-site affordable units out of 213 was ‘wholly unacceptable’.

‘An early stage review will be required and if, after further interrogation, the maximum level of affordable [housing] provision is still below 35 per cent, a late stage review will be required,’ it added.

The Lambeth Council planning report said: ‘ITV’s offer of 22 intermediate units, together with a £3.7 million payment in lieu towards the offsite provision of affordable housing, is considered to be the maximum feasible amount that can be provided by the development.

‘Given the level of affordable housing being offered, officers have therefore balanced the development’s viability and public benefits flowing from ITV returning to occupy the site.’

In a planning document prepared on behalf of ITV, Hopkins last year said the existing London Television Centre production centre was becoming outdated.

The design and access statement said: ‘The building fabric and services are dated and no longer support the needs of ITV, nor reflect the open and collaborative way in which ITV works.

‘A new building also has the potential to strengthen and contribute to the Strategic Cultural Area.’

Construction could begin by the end of this decade.

View the planning application in full here

The london studios itv

The london studios itv

Source: Soloman McKenzie

ITV’s London studios

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Who are all these heritage snowflakes? ITV need up dated facilities and financial security. The existing building is a good 70s? tower, but has served it’s purpose. The south bank has changed beyond recognition, especially after the Globe, Millenium Bridge and Shard have been finished.

    And how many layers of permission do we have to go thru to get anything done? We waste so much time with all these fussy and over paid bureaucrats and well meaning political egos?

    Get on with it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.