Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Holocaust Memorial protestors furious over ‘undemocratic power grab’


Opponents of David Adjaye and Ron Arad’s controversial Holocaust Memorial have lambasted the government’s decision to call in the scheme, calling it an ‘undemocratic power grab’

In an unexpected move, the government decided on Tuesday evening (5 November) that housing minister Esther McVey would decide whether the scheme went go ahead instead of Westminster Council.

The local planning authority had been preparing to make a decision on the scheme after it was submitted for the contentious site at Victoria Tower Gardens on Millbank earlier this year.

The UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation’s (UKHMF) asked for the scheme be called in on 30 October and McVey accepted its request a few days later.

Eric Pickles, who co-chairs the new memorial foundation, tweeted that he was ‘delighted that [McVey] has “called in’’ the planning application’, adding that both he and co-chair Ed Balls ‘agree … that the decision should be taken nationally’.

But the decision and its timing, on the eve of parliament’s dissolution ahead of the December 12 general election, has been strongly criticised by opponents of the memorial.

Ruth Deech, who is part of a group of Jewish peers opposed to the project, said: ‘It is insulting to use the start of an election campaign to hide this undemocratic power grab.

‘I am also deeply suspicious of the overlap between Conservative Party fundraising and the backers of the project. The Jewish community has been steadily turning against this politicised project because there are much better ways to tackle antisemitism’.

Meanwhile, the Save Victoria Tower Gardens (SVTG) campaign said the government was ‘subverting’ the checks and balances of the normal planning process.

‘Now the secretary of state [sic] will be judging the government’s own planning application without the benefit of the council’s recommendations,’ said architect Barbara Weiss.

A public inquiry will now be held and overseen by an independent planning inspector, while McVey will have the final call on the application if she remains housing minister after the election.

The foundation’s letter argued that the scheme had ‘generated national interest’ with over 4,500 comments uploaded to Westminster Council’s planning portal, many of which ‘refer to the significance of the memorial to the nation’.

However, a significant chunk of those comments were objections and the UKHMF has faced criticism for trying to ‘rig’ the planning application for the site after it paid consultants £118,000 for a ‘public engagement campaign’.

According to opponents of the scheme, the campaign saw a spike in the number of supportive comments sent to the planning authority from an average of one a day to 149 a day.

The call-in follows revelations this summer that Westminster Council officers were ’heading towards’ recommending rejection for the scheme.

A Westminster City Council spokesman said: ‘We note the government has called in the planning application for the proposed UK Holocaust Memorial for a local inquiry.  

‘We’ve been clear to date that we would consider the scheme on its merits and in line with our planning policy. We await further information from the Planning Inspectorate on the proposed call-in process and will play our part as necessary.’

Early call-ins such as this are rare. Asked for precedents, the ministry said it had called in a modification to a Hazardous Substances Consent at a site on the Greenwich peninsula linked to delivery of the Silvertown Tunnel. 

Holocaust memorial 04 index

Holocaust memorial 04 index


Readers' comments (3)

  • Just think - here's a chance for the government to try and get one over on Labour by demonstrating their commitment to fighting anti semitism.
    It'll be up to the planning inspector to navigate a properly impartial line through the minefield - and surely for everyone who cares for this little park to strenuously object in the event that McVey & co choose to ignore the inspector's advice should it be against the proposed development.
    If this sounds hostile to our government, it's because I recently heard McVey's fellow minister Gove on BBC R4 Today deflect every single question on our government's performance into a string of creative condemnations of what he claimed to be the opposition's policies.
    We live in fraught political times, and for the future of Victoria Tower Gardens to depend on the whim of what might be reverting to the label of the 'nasty party' would be shameful indeed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This was always going to be highly contentious, made even more so by the Brexit General Election. I must say I think this little piece of green alongside the river is getting overcrowded. But a prominent memorial is needed, due to the monstrous crime committed, and the very great contribution Jewish people and other immigrants have made to this country. Perhaps a series of smaller monuments in the West End, Whitechapel, Manchester and other areas where the diaspora settled?

    It is right that central government decides this. It was going to end up here anyway after various stages of messing around by Westminster?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Location aside, the whole concept needs a re-think.

    The importance and urgency of an appropriate Holocaust commemoration is real, not least because it is poised to pass from living memory. That's what prompted the establishment of the cross-party Holocaust Commission to begin with.

    The Commission consulted widely and came back with 4 key findings:

    1. Dissatisfaction with the current national memorial in Hyde Park.

    2. Holocaust education fails to reach young people.

    3. Inadequate support for regional projects and lack of long-term funding for Holocaust education.

    4. The testimony of survivors and liberators needs to be urgently recorded and preserved.

    From all that they somehow concluded that what was needed was 'a striking and prominent new National Memorial'.

    What's more, the Memorial HAD to be in Central London -- because they cannot imagine that anything can be of national stature if it's not within walking distance of The Strand.

    The whole thing is just bizarre.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.