Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Historic England officially objects to Neville and Giggs’ ‘aggressive’ Manchester towers

  • Comment

The government’s heritage watchdog has said it is ‘deeply concerned’ about proposals to build a pair of bronze-clad skyscrapers in central Manchester and will officially object to the Make-designed scheme

Historic England said a video released by the backers of the high-rise St Michael’s development – a consortium which includes former Manchester United footballers Gary Neville and Ryan Giggs – showed ‘how aggressively the proposed buildings would jar against the grand civic buildings’ around Albert Square.

The organisation feared the design, height and colour of the 31 and 21-storey towers would dominate the Deansgate/Peter Street conservation area and dwarf the nationally-important Grade II*-listed Central Library and Grade I-listed Town Hall.

A spokeswoman for Historic England added that the current proposal was ‘not good enough to justify the damage it would cause to the streets around the site’.

Make towers from albert square

News of Historic England’s objection comes just days after the heritage organisation refused to list the 1953 Manchester Reform Synagogue in Jackson Row, one of three buildings in Jackson’s Row earmarked for demolition to make way for the new high-rise development.

The neighbouring 1937 Neoclassical Bootle Street Police Station and the Sir Ralph Abercromby pub will also be pulled down if Make wins planning for the new development, which includes a 201-bed hotel and 159 flats.

Speaking about Historic England’s decision to challenge the scheme, the organistation’s planning director in the North West Catherine Dewar, said: ‘We are deeply concerned about how this scheme would affect some of Manchester’s most precious heritage. It would have an impact on people’s appreciation and experience of the stunning town hall and library but it would also erase different layers of this area’s history, irreparably damaging the special character of the surrounding conservation area.’

This scheme is not good enough to justify the damage it would cause

She added: ‘A dynamic city like ours needs to fully embrace development but this scheme is not good enough to justify the damage it would cause to the streets around the site and to the setting of the city’s most important buildings and spaces. It threatens Manchester with the loss of historic places that have soul and tell important stories about our city’s past.’

Meanwhile the petition against the scheme, which claims the ‘huge, dark towers’ are ‘in the wrong place’ has now received more than 3,200 signatures.

Earlier in the year Neville insisted the project team had undertaken extensive public consultation and taken on board comments wherever possible from Historic England, PlacesMatter! and the general public.

Make and the development team have been contacted for comment.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs