Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

‘His character has been smeared’ – Brokenshire defends Scruton’s appointment

Roger scruton shutterstock 1098423650

Housing secretary James Brokenshire has robustly defended Roger Scruton as the ‘right man for the job’ amid calls for him to be sacked from his new role as chair of the government’s beauty watchdog 

The writer and philosopher has been at the centre of a media storm over a number of controversial opinions he has made, including that Islamophobia is a ’propaganda word’ and that gay adoption is ‘not normal.’

Scruton also claimed in a public speech in 2005 that there was no such crime as date rape and described sexual harassment as merely ‘sexual advances made by the unattractive’.

He has also faced criticism over comments he made about philanthropist George Soros in a 2014 lecture, where he said: ‘Many of the Budapest intelligentsia are Jewish, and form part of the extensive networks around the Soros empire.’

Shadow housing secretary Andrew Gwynne, who tabled an urgent question in the Commons over Scruton’s appointment to the Building Better, Building Beautiful commission, said his comments were ‘unacceptable’.

He added: ‘If we are going to have a society which welcomes free speech, we should also hold those people to account for what they use this privilege to say.’

But Brokenshire robustly defended Scruton, describing him as a ‘global authority on aesthetics’ and ‘a public intellectual of renown’. He said Scruton’s comments had been taken out of context.

‘I have to say it saddens me that someone who has done so much to champion freedom of speech and freedom of expression should be subject to misinformed ill-judged and very personal attacks of the kind we have seen over the last few days,’ he said. 

‘It saddens me that his views have been so misrepresented, and his character has been smeared.’

Gywnne also called for Brokenshire to pull out of a lecture being delivered by Scruton at the Policy Exchange tomorrow night (Wednesday 14).

Labour MP Clive Efford argued that what was at stake was not defending freedom of speech but whether someone who had ‘extreme views’ was suitable for a high-profile public role.

But Tory MPs lined up to praise Scruton, with Conservative former minister Edward Leigh accusing Labour of ‘student union smear tactics to deliberately attack a distinguished philosopher’.

But another Tory former minister, Ed Vaizey, echoed concern raised by architects at the new commission’s emphasis on ‘beautiful’ buildings.

While he defended Scruton’s character, he added: ‘I don’t want him to lead a commission that simply advocates for Neo-Georgian pastiche as a definition of beauty, and I hope the commission will include contemporary architects, women architects and people from BAME backgrounds as well,’ he said.

However former Tory transport minister John Hayes, known for his distaste of contemporary architecture, was overjoyed at the traditionalist’s appointment. ‘Scruton will bring a lively, imaginative, well-researched report which will inform all of our thinking and, my god, we need it after years of dull egalitarian Modernism.’

In a statement last week, Scruton said he was ‘offended and hurt’ by suggestions that he was any way antisemitic or Islamophobic, insisting ‘nothing could be further than the truth’.

He said: ‘If people actually read my comments regarding the interplay between George Soros and Hungary, they will realise they are not in any way anti-Semitic, indeed quite the opposite.

‘My statements on Islamic states points only to the failure of these states, which is a fact.’


Readers' comments (3)

  • Many moons ago I had the pleasure of spending a few days with Roger Scruton, at a 21st Century Trust's seminar. I enjoyed his sharp mind, and indeed also his sharp tongue. I did not enjoy some of his views.
    As architecture is about space, light, joy and social and environmental responsibility, and not about 'beauty' or styles', it is my view that a neutral advocate would serve us better.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • To describe Roger Scruton as 'a global authority on aesthetics' is akin to describing Jacob Rees-Mogg as an representing all that's noble in politics - or (stretching the point to its limits) Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson as 'a man of the people'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Louis Kahn:
    “A great building must begin with the unmeasurable, must go through measurable means when it is being designed and in the end must be unmeasurable.”
    No space for beauty czars in this process...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.