Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Government review into need for ARB begins

  • 1 Comment

The government has announced the start of a review that could spell the end of the Architects Registration Board (ARB)

The three-yearly review is part of the government drive to ensure that all ‘Arms Length Bodies continue to have regular challenge on their remit and governance arrangements.’

Spearheaded by Stephen Williams, under-secretary of state for Communities and Local Government, the review has a brief to determine if there is a ‘continuing need’ for ARB and, if there is, whether it can be run more efficiently.

The announcement comes in the wake of The Association of Consultant Architects’ (ACA) call for the government to trim down ARB’s role; stripping back its regulatory functions to ‘the minimum necessary’ and slashing the annual fee to architects as a result.

The ACA’s stance mirrored the revised position agreed by the RIBA two weeks ago (see AJ 21.03.14). The association said it wanted the board’s other functions such as its roles covering the code of conduct, disciplinary matters and validating courses ‘contracted’ out - possibly to the RIBA.

The RIBA’s previous policy from 2009 set out how it wanted ‘to maintain protection of title’ but with that task transferred from the ARB to the RIBA - a switch which would effectively spell the end for the board.

But at a RIBA Council on Wednesday (19 March 2014), a revised strategy to keep a pared-back ARB as an ‘independent minimal registration’ body, but with other functions potentially shifting across to the institute, was agreed.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Having to have a single entity that is the RIBA both a statutory board and a professional institution will solve the matter in its entirety...therefore maintaining the register; protecting the consumer and the title; education; recognition of qualifications. Essentially a one stop shop.

    Then again, will they require a newer and perhaps a much larger headquarters for all this?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs