Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Government ‘actively working’ on Irish Sea bridge

Alan Dunlop's proposed Celtic Crossing

Boris Johnson’s much-touted idea of a bridge between Scotland and Northern Ireland is actively being worked on by government officials, the prime minister’s spokesman has revealed for the first time

At a lobby briefing yesterday (10 February), Johnson’s spokesman said that ‘a range of’ government officials are looking into the idea of the bridge, although no indication of a timescale was revealed.

Journalists at the briefing quoted the prime minister’s spokesman as saying: ‘Government officials are carrying out work in relation to the idea of a bridge linking the GB mainland to Northern Ireland. There is a proper piece of work being carried out into the idea.’

The spokesperson added: ‘It is reporting into No10, but obviously we will take advice from wherever it is needed.’

In September, Channel Four News reported that the prime minister had asked the Treasury and Department for Transport to prepare a feasibility study examining the costs and risks of a possible link.

The plan has been portrayed by some observers as an attempt to mollify Northern Irish unionists, at a time of anxiety over new customs checks between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK under Johnson’s Brexit plan.

At December’s general election the Democratic Unionist Party made the bridge part of its manifesto, arguing it returned better value than HS2. 

Asked about the bridge by DUP MP Ian Paisley before Christmas, Johnson told the House of Commons it was ‘a very interesting idea’, adding: ‘I advise him to watch this space and, indeed … watch that space between the islands, because what he has said has not fallen on deaf ears.’

Yesterday’s announcement is the first official confirmation that the government is actively working on the project.

The idea of a crossing between the countries was revived by architect Alan Dunlop in 2018 after Johnson, who was then foreign secretary, said he was interested in the idea of a bridge to France.

Johnson later turned his attention to a Scotland-Northern Ireland bridge.

The notion of building across the Irish Sea is not new, but concept proposals, including plans for a huge tunnel which was put forward during the First World War, have never progressed.

The Ministry of Defence has acknowledged that more than a million tonnes of weapons were dumped in the Irish Sea, much of it in Beaufort’s Dyke, a deep trench between Scotland and Northern Ireland. Frequent stormy weather and the difficulty of dragging into place pier structures that are likely to be taller than the Eiffel Tower are other potential problems.

Chris Wise, the engineering designer of the 2012 Olympic Velodrome, told The Guardian the scheme was ‘socially admirable but technically clueless’.

It has even been suggested that by the time it was completed Scotland might have voted for independence, while Northern Ireland could have voted to be part of a united Ireland.

However, the scheme appears to be taken seriously at the top of government. Some media outlets are reporting that Johnson wants the project to be the UK’s equivalent of the Øresund Bridge, which links Sweden and Denmark.

Dunlop, the principal of Alan Dunlop Architects, has previously estimated the price tag for a crossing from Mull of Kintyre to Torr Head would be about £12 billion. But he argues that a bridge between Portpatrick and Bangor or Larne could have more benefits, though it would also cost more.

As London mayor, Johnson backed the Garden Bridge, despite repeated warnings, spending £53.5 million of funds – £43 million of it taxpayers’ money – on a scheme that was never built.

A Downing Street spokesperson confirmed the lobby briefing to the AJ but said there was no further detail at this stage.


Readers' comments (5)

  • What a great idea, a bridge between a future independent Scotland and a United Ireland both in the EU and paid for by the UK. Surely a more relevant project would be a bridge between London and New York to carry all that scrumptious chlorinated chicken and hormone-injected beef.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm happy to look at that too. Chlorinated chicken eh ? Yum yum. But hormone injected beef..you've taken that too far.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Daniel Lacey

    Is this to start replacing the ones that Nigel Farage has burned?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • DUP MP Ian Paisley (the lesser) might personally prefer a bridge to the Maldives, but one to Scotland might do - and could even expedite the sending of reinforcements to bolster defences on the border, with all the alarmist talk of reunification being a serious possibility.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The only plausible reason for building new 19th Century technology railway infrastructure is for rapid troop movements. Linking HS2 with the bridge from Scotland to Northern Ireland confirms this. Many troops will be needed to put down the rebellion in Scotland and defend our land borders with the EU in Northern Ireland. Build the wall!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.