Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Gough leaps to Gehry's defence in Hove

  • Comment
Piers Gough, one of the driving forces behind Frank Gehry's King Alfred proposals for Hove, has written a defence of the hugely contentious scheme.

The CZWG principal has attempted to respond to criticism from both CABE and English Heritage.

His comments come in a lengthy document he produced for the latest iteration of Gehry's planning application, which is being processed at the moment.

It is widely understood that Gough was instrumental in bringing Gehry to the South Coast to work on the King Alfred project, which would see two towers of residential units and a new leisure centre for the city. It has been dubbed 'Tin Can Alley' by locals.

But Gough's document is insistent that the scheme - which has been plagued by local opposition - is of a high architectural standard.

'CABE and English Heritage have raised concerns, but not objections, and these have been carefully considered in the design development as well as following the guidance in the letters received,' he said.

'This is a grand public project in an important position across the main carriageway.

'The skill of the architect is in manipulating the high-, medium- and low-rise elements of the design to mediate between the existing very mixed qualities of the close and more distant surroundings and a major new landmark public project for the city,' Gough's document concludes.

by Ed Dorrell

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.